I'm supposed to write a paper for a class about technology and work, and I've chosen to do it on a subject we went over in class called crowdsourcing. More narrowly, I've chosen to do it on video game information sites that employ this technique or model, the prototypical example of which is a site we are all familiar with: GameFAQs.
HonestGamers is also an example of crowdsourcing, albeit on a much smaller scale. It does seem that the most prolific contributors are staff, but this site has amassed over 6000 reviews in part because of the open call for users to contribute.
To my knowledge most of you who are users have not been compensated in any way, yet you still contribute, which ultimately benefits the site. For the purposes of my assignment, it would help me greatly if you could respond here with your personal motivations for contributing here, and what you feel you get out of it. If some of you have actually been compensated or rewarded in some way, tell me that too (unless Jason doesn't want you to for some reason). I have actually received gift certificates in the past. It would also help if you could tell me why you continue to contribute over the course of several years and why you think this particular site and community is able to sustain itself - that is, continually produce content - the way it does.
Any input from anyone would be very much appreciated, but especially those who have contributed much without ever being full-time staff.
Thank you.


darketernal Apr 28, 2010
I have a feeling a few others will have this exact response.
jerec Apr 28, 2010
zippdementia Apr 28, 2010
Most people enjoy being with a social network of people who share their interests. What I get out of HG is the ability to share creative ideas with other talent and then get feedback that allows me to further enhance my own skills.
It's building my social capital. With the advent of the internet we can build social capital in ways we wouldn't have been able to in the past and with larger groups of people.
The occasional free game gives the whole thing a sense of shared commitment and responsibility. I feel like I have deadlines and people that rely on me to get my material out there consistently in terms of both time and quality. This is OUR community and our actions reflect back on it and, ultimately, back on us. Taking it to a further extreme, the success of this community will mean success for everyone involved. I think it's a very exciting opportunity.
A lot of companies don't like to share the true responsibility of running the company with the employees. But shared responsibility leads to further reliability.
Everyone's got a stake.
wolfqueen001 Apr 28, 2010
Anyway, I participate here because I think it's fun. I see it as a way to express myself in a community of like-minded individuals (or, at least a community with the same interests, that is, gaming and reviewing). I see it as a way to improve myself as well as give me a sense of fulfillment when I'm alone. I also have an idealistic mindset in which I think that somehow the little I manage to contribute might somehow make a difference, even if what I do isn't as important as, say, what staff or other important people on here do.
zippdementia Apr 28, 2010
radicaldreamer Blogger Apr 28, 2010
zippdementia Apr 28, 2010
randxian Apr 28, 2010
- To both receive and give constructive feedback.
- Regarding the above, to share ideas and try to assimilate new, creative ideas others suggest into my own works.
- To give fair assessments of games. Conveying what makes my favorite games so great and why my least favorite games are trash.
- To be involved in a community and develop rapport with other people.
Halon Apr 28, 2010
So my two main motivations are the community and for personal goals. These may be improving my writing, clarity, some stylistic change, etc. I don't review anymore because there isn't as much inspiration around here as there used to be and in general I'm pretty disinterested in videogames today. There are very few games that I enjoy nowdays, so it's difficult for me to analyze them and form an unbiased opinion.
overdrive Staff Apr 28, 2010
I've always written. It's my main skill. I've also always wanted to follow in the footsteps of authors I've followed like Peter Straub, Stephen King, H.P. Lovecraft, etc.
That ain't working. When it comes to stuff like that, I suck. I can't write characters...my ideas are generic and I basically intimidate myself out of every potentially good idea I have because I've lost all confidence in myself as a fiction-writer.
This is different. It's short (600-1500 word) reviews of a medium I'm comfortable with writing about. I still haven't been burnt out, despite maintaining a pace that's been from 25-50 per year for 6-7 years.
Essentially, I've found a niche for letting my creativity flow where I'm good at what I do. It's nice to write something and feel that I just wrote something kick-ass (and have that feeling verified by others from time to time), as opposed to writing something, deciding it just sucks and deleting it out of frustration.
True Apr 29, 2010
It's different here, though I've never really taken the time to consider why. Perhaps it's because we (meaning everyone but me) is above the petty, trivial bullshit, and we care far more about writing and games than we do making a name for ourselves. Maybe it's the fact that we are so involved that we start to know each other on a personal level--sometimes good, sometimes bad.
The contests and forums play a big part in that, and help with the motivation. Though there's no prizes, the thrill of competition is often the difference needed in what could possibly become stagnant.
It's having a good staff, and a down-to-earth webmaster. I contributed here for a long time because I wanted to see the site grow, while expressing my ideas. Jason allows a lot of expression beyond the norm--something not a lot of sites can say--and that inspires the artist in me.
And most of all, it's the regular users. Despite a few trolls, I truly believe that everyone is here to help everyone. Especially guys like Zipp, A-Man and Rand who try and give as much feedback as possible, or go above and beyond, editing work that's not their own.
We argue at times, and bicker, and do stupid shit (me especially) but so do some of the larger sites. The fact that HG is a fair size, but not huge, allows us to really get to know one another. And I may be the only one, but there's this bond that I have with a lot of people here--Jason, Genj, OD, A-Man, Zig--that makes this site fun, and encourages me to help it become bigger and better.
aschultz Apr 30, 2010
There may be places a lot of us post more, and there should be casual sites like this, but this is a place to put our concentrated thoughts down. I think also with something like video game writing, if you meet people who like to do it and not for the money, and you like it too, it's probably a good idea to keep in touch with these people. And sometimes I see something interesting and unusual from someone else I didn't expect.
It's also a great way to know that I have some small corner of the internet with my latest and hopefully best stuff. I have a few niche sites like this. Sometimes it's still a bit surprising that there are people with similar tastes yet different enough to provide variety and that it's lasted for a while.