I'm afraid now that any time I dish out unsolicited praise, people are going to think I'm trying to put down a disclaimer on the inevitable criticism. However, it must be said... with pictures, personality, and pizzaz, it's hard to beat most any Zigfried review. You know this is a solid review, Zig, so I'm gonna get straight to what little criticism I have. And no... that's not a disclaimer.
If this review had one area of weakness, it's that I'm not sure I come away actually knowing that much about the game. I come away feeling like I've had a good read, but in some ways your writing and personality took over in this one.
For instance, the first three or four paragraphs are spent on the game's miniscule backstory and then, a little later on, another two or three paragraphs are spent on talking about the joys of Greek aesthetic. The review also throws in references to a friend of yours and then ends by talking about the physical game disc and the game's worth.
After all that, I've been entertained. But I'm not sure I could tell anyone else what the hell this game is about except that it's a somewhat easy shooter. Maybe that's all there is to it.
In any case, I sort've feel like I'm criticizing gold for being too shiny. After all, you got me to actually care about a game that has absolutely no relevance to my life whatsoever and that I will never play. You do that a lot. I've got to start learning your secrets.
At the same time, I do think some of those paragraphs could've retained their personality and fun and been a little more connected to the way the game handles, rather than on what your best friend thought about it or how much it sells for on ebay. Especially with your finale being that the game was worth paying over a $100 for and is one of the Sega greats... I would like to have seen a bit more of the product itself and less of the paraphenelia.
Note to gamers: when someone shoots you in the face, they aren't "gay." They are "psychopathic."