It took a little while to put this together. Probably would have been easier to update it as I went, but whatever. Here it is.
This way we can see which judges favoured particular reviewers. Overdrive's record from Lewis and Sportsman was pretty bad, but I voted for him nearly every round. On the other end, Dagoss never scored a single vote from me, the only one (other than Turducken whom I don't count since he was only in for 2 weeks) to get no votes from any particular judge.
Janus managed to get 4-3 from each judge and Suskie got 6-1 from each of us.
And as I was judging, and then reading the other two judge's verdicts, I did notice we have different tastes. I tended to look for reviews that kept me interested, stuff that didn't take much time or effort to read. Lewis seemed to favour style and flair, often rewarding people for trying something different. Sportsman seemed to like just about everything, even in those matches where Lewis and I disliked both reviews.




bluberry Aug 10, 2009
Suskie Aug 10, 2009
Nice work, though, and you're totally right about the diversity of the judging this year. Really enjoyed that. I'm frankly surprised that I had as many 3-0 matches as I did, what with you guys having completely different taste.
aschultz Aug 11, 2009
Halon Aug 11, 2009
And I have been the nice judge this tourney, definitely. I've been saying nice effort to reviews that I would've given a 70 in an actual competition haha. You have to really screw up for me to come down hard on you. Not sure if I should continue being friendly in the playoffs, maybe I should take out all of the rage I built up in the 7 weeks on the reviewers next round.
jerec Blogger Aug 11, 2009
randxian Aug 11, 2009
zippdementia Aug 13, 2009