wow, i'm surprised my Modern Warfare 2 review has crept from last place to become my most popular review..and i don't consider it as one of my best ones. i don't know why, maybe its the only review up for the PS3 version. i can see no other explanation.



joseph_valencia Feb 5, 2010
wolfqueen001 Feb 5, 2010
Popularity: if a game is particularly mainstream or popular, I would expect that to generate a lot of hits. I imagine this partially contributes to your MW2 review, and I'm sure it applies to my Age of Empires review, too, which is my most popular review despite being one of my more poorly written ones.
Uniqueness: That is, whether your review is the only review on the site or for a particular console. I suspect your theory about your MW2 review being the only PS3 review of the game to be at least partially correct. Though I will say that I've seen unique reviews for games, including my own, that don't generate very many hits, but I attribute this to obscurity, which brings us to the next potential factor.
Obscurity: If the game is virtually unknown or only popular among certain circles, then it likely won't generate a lot of hits. I imagine this is the case with some of my reviews such as Musashi. I think this phenomenon is espeially true among Japanese-only titles, especially those who never received an import of some sort of sequel (i.e. Earthbound, which would generate a lot of attention regardless of the installment).
Referrals: Sometimes your reviews will be linked to other sites outside of HG. Of course, this is more common with staff reviews, but it has happened with user ones as well, particularly when a fansite gets involved. I remember being astounded sometime towards the end of '08 when I noticed my Digimon review had skyrocketed in hits. When I googled it to see if it'd turn me up anywhere, I found it had been linked to some sort of fansite, probably because it was the only positive review of the game on HG.
There are probably other factors as well, but these are just a few I thought of at the top of my head. Of course, if some of these factors mix together,they may produce entirely different results altogether. For example, if you produce a mainstream game review but it's already received a lot of coverage, it's unlikely to draw a lot of attention, especially if there's a staff review for it.
Anyway, I find a lot of this stuff interesting. It's really neat to see where your review hits lie after a month or year or so. And it generally feels good when you see a review you never expected to be read a whole lot shoot up all of a sudden, even if the one receiving all the attention isn't the best thing you've ever written.
honestgamer Staff Feb 5, 2010
espiga Feb 6, 2010
Halon Feb 6, 2010