I'm looking to pick up one of the following this month:
Assassin's Creed 2
Dragon Age
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2
All three have received high reviews, both here and from my friends. There are a few things I was trying to clear up about each game, though...
Assassin's Creed 2: has the story improved since the original? What about those ungodly twenty minute "cutscenes" before each mission? I hear a lot about missions being better, but are they more varied? I'm not looking for Grand Theft Auto: Rennaisance. I want something a little more visceral and a little more immersive than that.
Dragon Age: I hear it's nothing like "the second coming of Baldur's Gate" that it was advertised as. My question is, is it better than KOTOR? I was not a big fan of KOTOR. I'm looking for a game that's less linear than KOTOR was and involves either less long conversations or better written conversations.
Call of Duty Modern Warfare 2: I don't need another multi-player game. I've heard the single player mode is outstanding in the truest sense of the word; that is, it's a unique experience in the FPS genre. How enduring is it?
In the meantime, the rest of this month will probably be spent on Fatal Frame, which I intend to use as my "F" in the alphabetolympics.


Halon Dec 13, 2009
However that's probably the most negative review you'll ever see for the game so it's probably better than I'm making it sound.
Haven't played Dragon Age but I hear it is typical Bioware. Whether or not that's good or bad is up to you. Also I hear the PC version is the superior one but since I haven't played it I can't tell you why.
Suskie Dec 13, 2009
I would highly recommend Dragon Age, but considering the sacrilegious things you've said about KOTOR, you're probably better off playing something bad instead, seeing as you live in the Bizarro World. (To answer your question though, they could easily have titled the game Baldur's Gate 3D.)
zigfried Dec 13, 2009
//Zig
hmd Dec 13, 2009
radicaldreamer Dec 13, 2009
True Dec 13, 2009
I went all out--bought Bloodlines (and the PSP to go along with it), the hint book and sat through the Lineage movie before I ever touched it. And even with all that, it lasted me about five days.
It's massive, don't get me wrong, but it's so involved and addictive I had to play it. Everything they did right in the first part, they kept. Everything they did wrong was fixed.
I anticipated AC II for a long time--ever since the first one ended--and have to say it was completely worth it.
Dragon Age is... eh. It's kind of like a platform version of WoW without the online encounters. I suppose if you're into that sort of thing it's a good game but I've discovered I don't really have the patience for games like that anymore.
Modern Warfare is pretty sick. Campaign mode is quick and intense, but like Resistance 2, MW's crowning achievement is its multi-player. Still, I honestly don't think--as good as it was--that it compares to AC II. I second Suskie's vote on game of the year. It's definitely worth the $60.
zippdementia Blogger Dec 13, 2009