I guess I can understand why Nintendo is having such a hard time deciding how to handle their Online service as a value prospect for players who only will use it occasionally. The options that are available to the average person for experiencing retro classics are staggering, and it was impressive that Nintendo was able to make a dent at all with their "Classic" systems.
Anyone banking on the N64 Classic? I'm genuinely curious. It's not the most friendly of systems to emulate, given the way games were coded for it, support even with the best of emulators is spotty, and the games are magnitudes larger than modest SNES and NES carts. How many N64 games could you fit on... say... 4GB of flash memory?
Not many, though quite a few more than PSX games.
All of this comes to mind with my recent review of Bomberman for NES, which is something of a return to form for me, since I'm having to pace myself on the way back to full functionality. I've got a ways to go yet... and I gotta say I'm grateful to be able to flex the ol' brain muscle in this way.
Thinking about the games that gave you the skills you utilize now, particularly with regard to the games you play, and the ones you review, does moderate my attitude somewhat toward the later titles I cited as being "hand holders". I've never appreciated games that talk down to their players, regardless of their targeted demographic.
It's worse when a game goes "monkey flip the switch" when you're an adult - as a kid you might not notice that until you're older, but that depends on you as a kid. I grew up in an era largely without those sort of training wheels, so to speak. Even now I gravitate toward games that treat me like a human being... not so hard to understand, but at what point does the in game tutorial become a babysitter?
Anyway, I'll end this by saying something about Google's prospective console: Cool your crap down. Seriously. Dollars to donuts this will be a streaming/digital download centric machine that outpaces everything on the market, but soon to be overshadowed by Sony and Microsoft's next offering. Going digital only just makes sense now, but somehow I get the feeling the Big G will foul it up somehow... can you imagine anything that resembles Google Play on a system like the PS4 or Xbox?
Eeek.
Well, we'll see.



honestgamer Staff Mar 14, 2019
hastypixels Blogger Mar 15, 2019
Google isn't going to be able to claw anything away from their competitors, at worst they'll conflate what is already a confusing mess. As for the digital-only future, I find it interesting that Sony is holding their tongue about that move. If I had to guess they're not in a rush to beat Microsoft to market with that, even though they've had a great deal of success.
They've done a better job of delivering games, to be sure, up until the advent of the Switch.
honestgamer Staff Mar 15, 2019
hastypixels Blogger Mar 16, 2019
I mean over 700 games. Really? I will never play most of them and a waste of money is still a waste. At least Nintendo's storefront is actually selling games for their value (most of the time). I really don't want to see them going down the road of deeper discounts, even though that means I have fewer games on my Switch. There's nothing wrong with more deeply pondered purchasing decisions... money unmanaged manages us.
Masters Staff Mar 18, 2019
Also: remember the Ouya?
hastypixels Blogger Mar 18, 2019