Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | AND | IOS | PC | PS4 | SWITCH | VITA | XB1 | All

Chrono Cross (PlayStation) artwork

Chrono Cross (PlayStation) review


"...a fine example of how to push a console to its technical limits and players to their emotional ones."


Let it never be said that the talent at Squaresoft doesn’t know how to begin with a rollicking introduction. It’s hard to go wrong when the beginning of your Japanese Role Playing Game features top notch 3D rendered cutscenes, intensely memorable music and a fascinating opening set piece. I’m not sure how Yasunori Mitusuda does it, but the opening introduction always churns a mightily wistful melody - and I’m not ashamed to admit I tear up listening to it.

Mitsuda’s talent is rare, and it’s clear that Squaresoft - before the merger with Enix - was trying for a repeat of the dream team that developed the timeless classic, Chrono Trigger. There are so many reasons why this top drawer production fails to achieve the acclaim of its predecessor. Well, there is the SNES Japanese only release Radical Dreamers, but that’s more fascinating for its lore, aesthetic choices and music than anything else. It too was doomed to obscurity.

My Mom and I were hot off the heels of Final Fantasy IX, which I’ve lovingly covered in the past. That pinnacle of success overshadows Chrono Cross for as many reasons as it stands out, which I’ll get into shortly. Mainstream appeal is - in my humble opinion - the art of balancing the new and the innovative which is no mean feat. Unfortunately Chrono Cross fails in this regard, but before we get into why that is, let’s look at the premise and game mechanics.

Understand that your favourite tropes can be found here; there’s a girl who - in spite of being a world renowned thief - ends up needing your help, as the young male protagonist. Chrono Cross inherits some of Trigger’s qualities, such as a voiceless hero, which can feel awkward, but is actually cleverly played into the story. Hint: You know things aren't right when he starts talking. Chrono Cross has all kinds of narrative tricks up its sleeve, and it’s worth playing just to learn from them.

You are Serge, a rambunctious seafaring islander who has a penchant for acquiring allies and serving as a link between dimensions. That’s the “Cross” in the title. Instead of travelling through time to "Trigger" events that have consequences that affect specific instances, you are the nexus where possibilities intersect. In Cross there’s no landscaping or building of bridges, since the focus of consequences is the interactions between peoples and races in this world.

That aforementioned cute girl is Kid, and once you’ve locked in the name for the hero, you’re introduced to a curious tower that looks like stacked slabs supported by carved dragons on each face. From there you get to know Kid and a third, randomized character chosen from a selection of 45 potential allies. If it sounds like too much to manage, just try and imaging there being another twenty and a selection of 120 possible endings.

Intersecting and intertwining paths is Chrono Cross spectacular hook: A character tree with more branches than you can shake a stick at. The two main characters are fixed, as mentioned, but during your journey a plethora of interactions with objects, people and the world will decide which characters you can recruit into your party. It is overwhelming, honestly. I never had the heart to abandon Kid in the beginning, so Leena never became an option - ever. That's just one example of how one loses access to recruitable party members.

That said, Cross doesn’t shy away from tough choices, or brutal consequences. There’s one early on that isn’t too spoilerific if you’re curious about it - and could well peak your interest, so I’ll get into it, but I’d like to address combat, since it’s one of Cross’ shining - or defeating - moments of innovation, depending on your perspective. Reset your expectations, because this one eschews typical combat almost entirely.

Like Final Fantasy VII and others before it, Cross has your character running around an overworld that has three layers: The world map, small locations such as Cape Howl and the Hydra Marshes, and then combat, which takes place in a fully polygonal space of decidedly third generation console fidelity. The Playstation’s limited polygon budget has a tendency of tipping its hand where interactables are concerned. If everything in the room is smooth except for the chin of that dragon statue, chances are you need to figure out what role it plays in your progress.

The developers were - naturally - versed in the PSX’s peculiarities, so they’ve planted a number of false positives when the situation is relaxed enough that it doesn’t break the tension. Likewise, key events are always fixed, but usually reached with multiple paths that involve making choices about who you’re going to recruit in order to accomplish said goal. For instance, in order to sneak into Viper Manor - for answers, not treasure you cheeky thief, you - choosing from amongst two allies is your first taste of world shifting consequence. There's Pierre, the conceited swordsman or the suave magician Magnus.

Pierre’s plan for entering Viper Manor differs from Magnus’ plan as you storm the gates instead of climbing treacherous, treasure laden cliffs where boulders hurled by the watchmen might send you tumbling to the bottom. Why your presence doesn’t raise alarms is puzzling, but it does speak to Cross’ misanthropic relationship with cause and effect. For instance: With forty-five characters to chose from, how many of them have an impact on the outcome of the game?

None. A handful of them unlock access to materials you’ll use to craft top tier rainbow weapons - no joke - but otherwise the only reason to unlock characters is to see how events change when you do. The dimensions I mentioned are just two, and for the most part mirror each other by reflecting different outcomes of military power. As such you can recruit the double of one character and have them meet their mirror self. This can be amusing, but doesn’t extend far beyond “You are a Norris from another world.”

Nice observation there, blondie, but ... now what? Narratively, those dead ends mean most characters aren’t worth acquiring because the story isn't going to stray so far from those key events, previously mentioned. Not to say there aren’t a few gems: Pip is the trademark adorable puffball and actually changes appearance depending on what elements you have him use.

Oh yeah, combat. See, it’s this high degree of branching complexity that loses players, because honestly, who can keep track of so much, even when motivated to do so? Combat, on the other hand, is actually easy to master and I quite enjoyed it. There are three components you need to keep track of: Health, elemental level and field effect. Quite a contrast to the overblown roster of choose-your-questionably-applicable-hero.

I can’t really understate how elegant the balancing act of managing the risk vs reward system is in combat, once you get used to how things work. In a nutshell, you choose from three levels of attack. Think ‘soft, medium, hard’ where the first always has the highest percent chance to do damage. Each attack has a numerical value that you use to build up the level charge for casting elements, which are your items and spells.

Mastering combat is undoubtedly the most enjoyable thing to do in Chrono Cross, and even presents the challenge of figuring how to obtain the highest level elements. This means learning the field system in which the colour of the field is changed in three ringed sections according to the order and colour of the elements cast. With six elemental colours to manage, it does require some strategy when you encounter even mid-level bosses.

That’s another thing: You can’t grind for levels here, instead your heroes just level up in small amounts as necessary when fighting tougher enemies. Bosses also give you a substantial boost and stars to use for top-grade special summoning elements. As a result you can encounter areas that are too tough for your party, but I found that to be a very minor issue that I could plan my way out of. There are also ways of acquiring weapon materials ‘early’ to give yourself an advantage, for a little while.

Now that we’ve covered Chrono Cross’ strengths, I wanted to get back to that not-so-spoilerific example of consequence quandary. Most of the time consequences in this game make sense and don’t seem out of place, but this rather harsh instance does. It’s actually a sore point with fans, as well. Sigh. Enough prevaricating.

When Kid, in dire straits, needs your help you have but one means of saving her. It’s a key event, and the story won’t progress until you do this. I name dropped Hydra Marshes for reason, since it’s where you obtain the necessary curative. A beast that is extinct in “Another World” is alive and well in “Home World”, where Serge originated from. Naturally, you’ve got to slay the beast and bring its fluids back to restore Kid to health.

This is where things get ugly. What I didn’t mention was the dwarves who defended the Hydra, who block your path. So, you all but wipe them out in order to achieve your goal, and they declare vengeance. Except, here’s where it gets questionable. They apparently swim on over to an island of faeries and proceed to enact genocide upon them all. This was harrowing for my Mom and I, and we spent months searching for a way to prevent it.

The short answer is "you can't."

As a writer I understand the rationale, but I definitely don’t agree with its implementation. There are too many failures in logic for it to be feasible, and it comes off as social commentary more than a natural consequence of poor choices. Logic in a dimension hopping game? You must be mad! Look, either cause and effect is universal, or its trivial. How would I have done it differently? That’s not an easy one to answer, because ultimately the player portrayed as being in the wrong.

I see this question as a largely cultural one. How fair is it for us to survive when others die, if all life is precious? A reasonable question that can only be answered personally, and the perspective of this story doesn't jive with my belief that everything has a purpose. In terms of story execution, the point is forced and heavy handed, because there never was a peaceful option for the player.

We never get to see how it could have gone differently and thus the player's heroics are damned as thoughtless and even destructive folly in spite of its hopeful resolution at the end. Why bother saving time from the Devourer if all you can do is crush and destroy? Absolutely yes violence is horrible and even senseless, but these consequences would have had more impact if they had branched that path instead of extending it for the legions of forgettable characters who exist for almost no reason at all.

At the risk of sounding melodramatic I have to ask: Is the point really that the only way the faeries can live is if the dwarves don’t?

Alright, enough of that noise. The very fact that Chrono Cross raises these questions speaks to its status as a classic. It wasn't a rarity in its heyday, and I find it difficult to recommend by virtue of combat, graphics and music alone. Artistry of this quality serves a platformer well enough, but an RPG needs a solid payoff for me to declare it worthy of revisiting, or even taking on for the first time. The accent system underlines the third wheel character dialogue, which in turn becomes interchangeable mush that renders the beautifully drawn cast into a largely forgettable haze.

Is it perhaps ironic that it is maintained by opportunity over other RPGs that better deserve the spotlight? At the time no one did branching paths as well, and it was a technical achievement experienced only on platforms such as the PC. If you do choose to dive in, you can pick this one up cheaply for digital download on the PS3 and PS4. Alternatively, it can be easily emulated for higher graphic fidelity, or gasp played on authentic hardware. However you slice it, this controversial example of the genre continues to be a fine example of how to push a console to its technical limits and its players to their emotional ones.

4/5

hastypixels's avatar
Community review by hastypixels (November 24, 2018)

Just a guy plonking away at a keyboard containing wit no greater than his own.

More Reviews by hastypixels [+]
Canabalt (PC) artwork
Canabalt (PC)

Does exactly what it promises: Runs and jumps.
20XX (Switch) artwork
20XX (Switch)

Putting rogue-lite action where Capcom's disinterest was.
Subsurface Circular (Switch) artwork
Subsurface Circular (Switch)

Who knew an A.I. mystery could be so riveting?

Feedback

If you enjoyed this Chrono Cross review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
EmP posted November 24, 2018:

There was a meme about a bad game mere here once. It's gone now.
board icon
hastypixels posted November 24, 2018:

Well, that was eloquent.
board icon
EmP posted November 24, 2018:

There's a long running Chrono Cross feud going around these here parts. It's been quiet for a while; most of the party have since vanished mysteriously. This might just be the catalyst for a revival.

Good review for an awful, awful game.
board icon
hastypixels posted November 24, 2018:

Thank you, but it struck me that the image looks like review bashing, not game bashing. I'll be the first to admit CC's lengthy list of flaws - which would have required a longer review, but that's an awfully large image to appear at the bottom of a retrospective essay.

This isn't 4chan - and also - I don't go around bashing games or reviews, and I'm not about to start.
board icon
Fiddlesticks posted November 24, 2018:

This review is an honest take on how it makes the author feel. Too bad we don’t share the same experience. I put a few hours into CC years ago and found it melodramatic and aimless. Like the game, this review is a little hard to follow in places. I figure hastypixels is a really smart guy whose brain is constantly exploding with ideas. The fingers can’t keep up with the mind, that sort of thing. I don’t think anyone’s bashing the review. On the other hand, EmP and I both agree that Chrono Cross the game sucks.
board icon
hastypixels posted November 24, 2018:

Thanks for yanking the image, EmP. I appreciate that.

@Fiddlesticks - exploding with ideas, well yeah, but writing with a headcold doesn't help that very much. A big part of HG's beauty is in the name, and I'm glad for that. HG stands out in that way - how many sites have differing viewpoints on one game?

HG is awesome, and it's a community I'm pleased to be a part of. :)
board icon
overdrive posted November 27, 2018:

Ah, the Chrono Cross debate, where some think this game is a total classic, EmP thinks it's total trash and I'm the one who is right because I think it's a decent game that could have been great, but was bloated with way too many meaningless characters (instead of focusing on a core cast) that all blend together because you attach mostly the same skills to their boards AND, like a lot of PS RPGs, it does kind of fall apart down the stretch, as the final dungeon is dull with a bunch of "padding" mini-bosses.

But that makes me think: On this site, both now and in our history, is this the game that has the most diverse set of reactions or is there another that outmatches it? It'd have to be either a big name game or a cult classic (so that enough people here have played it to have a definite opinion) obviously. But usually, we as a group at least have a general consensus with maybe 1-2 outliers. With Chrono Cross, we're all over the place from great to good to decent to meh to outright crap.
board icon
pickhut posted November 28, 2018:

But that makes me think: On this site, both now and in our history, is this the game that has the most diverse set of reactions or is there another that outmatches it? It'd have to be either a big name game or a cult classic (so that enough people here have played it to have a definite opinion) obviously. But usually, we as a group at least have a general consensus with maybe 1-2 outliers.

I did a little digging, and from what I was able to find before giving up, pages for Final Fantasy VIII and Metal Gear Solid come pretty close to matching Chrono Cross' divisiveness.

If anyone wants to do their own digging, check out the Site Statistics page; click a console and you'll see a list of what games have reviews and how many.
board icon
JedwardRandy posted November 28, 2018:

this is intersting write on the game I have not played. how are the 120 endings? I mean, are all of equal calibur or some are the better than others?
board icon
hastypixels posted November 29, 2018:

120 endings were planned in development, and just twelve of those were implemented, due to technical constraints. I'm sure there were narrative limits, too. 120 is enough to keep one busy for longer than it takes to reach those endings, and the idea is ridiculous.

As for Chrono Cross reception: I rather take it that this is one of those The Beatles vs The Rolling Stones situations. I like the example of Neil Young: Either you love 'im or you hate him, but then... I don't really do either, but that's how his relationship with listeners was typified back in his heyday.

Chrono Cross took a risk, and by many accounts failed, but left us with an exceptional soundtrack and some excellent character designs. The rest... is fodder for this sort of debate, which is no doubt good for the site. I'll have to pick more games with audiences this mercurial!

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

Policies/Ethics | Contact | Sponsor Site | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2018 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Chrono Cross is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Chrono Cross, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.