TT strategy

June 19, 2010

using only the axiom of completeness, i will prove that Doom 3 sucks.

Most recent blog posts from John L...

2010 in music

Review: 3DO Doom.

dave chappelle is a genius

Most recent blog posts from John L...
2010 in music Review: 3DO Doom. dave chappelle is a genius

Feedback

bluberry - June 19, 2010 (12:37 AM)
lemma: Doom p is a Banach space for 1 \leq p \leq \infty. Doom II is a Hilbert space.

EmP - June 19, 2010 (07:34 AM)
You overcomplicate.

That said, the deal was we both write a Doom 3 review, and you're years late.

Halon - June 19, 2010 (08:34 AM)
Instead you should prove DOOM II is awesome using the pigeonhole principle.

bluberry - June 19, 2010 (10:54 PM)
kind of like how we'd both check out PO'ed, emp?

and i dunno sportsman. i might need the axiom of choice for that and i don't want to piss off the purists.

Feedback
	bluberry - June 19, 2010 (12:37 AM) lemma: Doom p is a Banach space for 1 \leq p \leq \infty. Doom II is a Hilbert space.
	EmP - June 19, 2010 (07:34 AM) You overcomplicate. That said, the deal was we both write a Doom 3 review, and you're years late.
	Halon - June 19, 2010 (08:34 AM) Instead you should prove DOOM II is awesome using the pigeonhole principle.
	bluberry - June 19, 2010 (10:54 PM) kind of like how we'd both check out PO'ed, emp? and i dunno sportsman. i might need the axiom of choice for that and i don't want to piss off the purists.

© 1998-2025 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors.