The Video Game Reviews Community (HonestGamers)
Forums | Blogs | Register | Login | Users | Staff | Links

3DS
Dreamcast
DS
GameCube
iPad
iPhone/iPod
PC
PlayStation 2
PlayStation 3
PSP
Vita
Wii
Wii U
Xbox
Xbox 360
All
Follow Us

Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity
Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity (WII) game cover art
Genre:
Casual (Puzzle)

Developer:
Deep Silver
Publisher
Region
Released
Deep Silver
NA
04/15/2009
Deep Silver
EU
11/28/2008
Your Account Options
You currently have no privileges related to this game profile because you are not signed into an HonestGamers account. Please log in, or click to register for a free user account.

More Reviews by Mike Suskie

Diablo III (PC)
With so many of Diablo III's core functions being handled on Blizzard's end, the game's performance is directly tied to how well their servers are runnin...

Prototype 2 (Xbox 360)
While Prototype 2 is a definite improvement, it’s not like fixing the first game’s flaws unearths some hidden masterpiece here. It’s not a great sequel s...

The Elder Scrolls V: Skyrim (Xbox 360)
It’s very cold – in the thematic sense, though the snow certainly helps. Skyrim is one of the increasingly few Western RPGs to understand that “dark” is ...

Mass Effect 3 (Xbox 360)
Fans have been railing on BioWare for phasing out certain elements – the side quests are virtually nonexistent at this point, and dialog options are more limite...

Resident Evil 4 HD (Xbox 360)
I didn’t die all that much during my playthrough of RE4, yet I constantly – constantly – felt like I was within an inch of my death, scraping for ...

Best Wii Games
Okami (Wii) artwork
Okami
Average Rating: 9.5; Reviews: 2
Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition (Wii) artwork
Resident Evil 4: Wii Edition
Average Rating: 9.3; Reviews: 3
Super Mario Galaxy (Wii) artwork
Super Mario Galaxy
Average Rating: 9.1; Reviews: 9
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess (Wii) artwork
The Legend of Zelda: Twilight Princess
Average Rating: 9.0; Reviews: 3
World of Goo (Wii) artwork
World of Goo
Average Rating: 9.0; Reviews: 2
Sin & Punishment: Star Successor (Wii) artwork
Sin & Punishment: Star Successor
Average Rating: 9.0; Reviews: 2
No More Heroes (Wii) artwork
No More Heroes
Average Rating: 8.5; Reviews: 6
Sonic Colors (Wii) artwork
Sonic Colors
Average Rating: 8.5; Reviews: 4
Metroid Prime 3: Corruption (Wii) artwork
Metroid Prime 3: Corruption
Average Rating: 8.5; Reviews: 2
New Super Mario Bros. Wii (Wii) artwork
New Super Mario Bros. Wii
Average Rating: 8.5; Reviews: 2

Looking for a good read?
Check out a selection from our database of more than 8000 reviews! EmP has weighed in on The Secret Files: Tunguska for the Wii and figures it rates 7 out of 10. What do you think? Read the review, then be sure to leave feedback or chime in with one of your own!

Systems > Wii > P > Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity > Staff Review

Sign up for a free user account and you can leave feedback for this review or even submit a game review of your own!

Review by Mike Suskie
May 31, 2009

Professor Heinz Wolff’s Gravity never uses the Wii’s motion sensing capabilities for anything more than a navigation tool that looks an awful lot like the cursor you see on the computer screen right in front of you. That, along with the game’s no-frills visual presentation and general shortage of content, gives the impression that Gravity was meant to be a PC game, the kind created by an indie developer and sold for budget price as a Steam download. So why, then, is it a thirty-dollar Wii title?

It’s no shock, with only a hundred puzzles and little in the way of extras, that Gravity’s biggest mishap is that it doesn’t do enough with its intriguing concept. The game might as well have been called Physics for the generalities its challenges represent. They’re logic puzzles, really, and they all relate to gravity in some way. Each stage begins with the drop of a ball and ends, hopefully, with the triggering of a switch. The ball is the catalyst, meant to carry forth a process that, at the discretion of the player, will in some way end with the switch being hit. Whether or not each experiment will work comes down to one question: Is what I’m about to attempt physically possible?

A virtual representation of Heinz Wolff himself walks us through the basics of Gravity’s design. Each level presents a “play” button that sets things into motion, either by dropping the ball or, in a few cases, running an engine-powered cart. The switch is never triggered on its own, of course, and so the player is given a tool kit with a limited number of pieces that can be used to morph the scenery. Players can’t actually manipulate the puzzles themselves and must merely add to them with the pieces they have, which can be placed anywhere on screen assuming said placement is physically feasible. With the remote used as an on-screen pointer while the nunchuk is used to rotate objects, the Wii is certainly the ideal console to carry out this concept, but I could never shake the feeling that, again, perhaps Gravity would have worked better on PC, especially during the puzzles in which the placement of objects really requires a steady hand.

So what tricks do Gravity’s puzzles have you performing? Well, anything, so long as they relate to the laws of physics. In many cases, the ball itself is the device that’s meant to trigger the switch, and you’ve merely got to get it there. It could be as simple as building a bridge over a gap, albeit a bridge that must hold its own weight in addition to that of the ball. Sometimes the ball simply doesn’t have the default speed to get where it’s going, in which case you’ll either need to build a ramp for acceleration or position another ball in the path of the first one. You’re occasionally reminded, however, that it can be any object that activates the switch, not just the ball itself. An early example trains you to explore such possibilities by placing the switch in a high location the ball could never reach, and forcing you to design a tower that’s meant to collapse on top of it.

One of my favorite puzzles from Gravity actually has the player building a catapult under the drop point. The ball appears on one end of the screen, and the switch is perched in a basket on the opposite end, far out of the ball’s reach. With only three small items to work with, I must have stared at my TV screen for five whole minutes, wondering just how I was supposed to trigger that switch, and when the answer finally came to me, I nearly jumped in my seat. A good puzzle game, at least one that isn’t of the “falling blocks” variety, should really make the player feel intelligent, and it’s moments like these that absolutely do.

Of course, a game so centered on the laws of gravity, how one object reacts in relation to another, couldn’t possibly have worked without an impeccable physics system to back it up. Gravity delivers in this area, though this doesn’t always work in the game’s favor. In one level, the ball drops down an incline and falls into a rut, and the only tool at my disposal was a single square block. I wedged the block diagonally in the slot with the hope of launching the ball to its distant destination, but when I ran the level, the angle of the ball’s launch was off, and the target was missed. I was obviously on the right track but didn’t know what I could change. I wound up rotating the block, maybe, two degrees clockwise, and boom – the ball flew straight into the switch. I suppose the effect is realistic, but it’s not good game design. It’s this sort of laziness that makes me wonder how well Gravity was playtested.

Most of Gravity’s puzzles are great fun, however, with Wolff providing helpful advice at first then slowly backing off and allowing you to tackle the consistently ramping challenges on your own. The problem is longevity, not quality. A hundred puzzles may sound like a lot, but a large portion of them can be completed in under a minute, and such a small supply of available challenges won’t get you your money’s worth at that rate. What worse is that the supplementary material meant to expand the experience amounts to very little. Gravity’s one-person-at-a-time multiplayer mode offers four different mini-games, one that has players building towers that can withstand an earthquake (by far the most interesting of the bunch) and the others all involving a cannon used to shoot various objects. Each of these so-called party games deserves a quick look but likely won’t extend far beyond that.

And then there are the sandbox levels, which are gradually unlocked by completing the hundred basic puzzles, and which the game freely admits don’t really serve much of a purpose and are meant to be fooled around with. The very existence of these sandbox levels leads me to believe that Deep Silver liked what they’d come up with and assumed players would be intrigued enough to want to explore the world of Gravity further. So why, then, is there no puzzle editor? With Gravity’s content as limited as it is, and with each of the challenges simple enough in basic design that anyone could make them given an appropriate tool kit, a true puzzle editor could have been this game’s saving grace. With online functionality, the possibilities could have been endless. Instead, I can’t guarantee you’ll get your money’s worth until Gravity hits the bargain bin.




You can click the tabs on the above bar to choose whether you wish to read comments from visitors who have posted on Facebook, or from registered site users who have left feedback on the forums. Please leave a comment of your own if you have anything to say!


Info | Help | Privacy Policy | Contact | Advertise

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2012 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site--from reviews, guides, cheats and editorials to message board posts--may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Professor Heinz Wolff's Gravity, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors.