8000+ Reviews Since 1998!
 |
Reader review by Suskie
June 11, 2011 Never let it be said that I won’t look for every possible opportunity to bash Heavy Rain. I know it seems childish to repeatedly backlash over something I dislike being unwaveringly showered with praise, but if we’re living in a world where removing the gameplay from a game is considered “innovation,” then I’m proud to stand alone.L.A. Noire bears quite a few things in common with Heavy Rain, starting with the fact that it’s a dark detective story folded into an adventure game and certainly not ending with its central villain having an obsession with origami cranes. The key difference is that it was developed by Rockstar, and thus includes all of the things that a Rockstar production usually entails: a sprawling sandbox environment, cover-based shootouts, high-speed car chases through the streets of the city, and long conversations with NPCs to fill the time as you drive from one marked location on your radar to the next. I’m in a bit of an awkward position here, though, because it’s these more traditional game-y bits that turn out to be the worst thing about L.A. Noire.
Perhaps this is the most well-intentioned adventure title ever made – props to Rockstar for making a legitimate effort to elevate L.A. Noire to the status of an actual game – but that doesn’t make the shooting and fisticuffs any less clunky, nor does it make the hyper-scripted chase sequences any less predictable, nor does it prevent the tailing missions from evoking memories of the most boring moments in the Assassin’s Creed games. And it’s all thrown into a barren sandbox world that seems to have no reason to exist other than because this is a Rockstar game, and sandboxes are what they do. In fact, driving recklessly actually puts a black mark on your case ratings, and you can ask your partner to shuttle you from one location to the next and skip the ordeal entirely. So what’s the point?
What’s baffling about L.A. Noire as a sandbox game is that its story missions are presented in linear fashion, and as soon as you’ve finished one, you’re immediately advanced to the next. There’s never a moment when you’re not working on a major case, and your only incentives to diverge from the story’s path are to find and collect gold film reels (yawn) and to partake in street cases, all of which are bland and tiresome, and many of which can be completed in less than a minute. This is the best they could come up with? It’s obvious that a team of very talented artists put a lot of time, effort and affection into recreating 1940s-era Los Angeles from the ground up. And they did a spectacular job, but we’re never given a solid reason to even stop to admire the details, let alone explore the massive city they built. It’s such a waste.
So, obviously, L.A. Noire doesn’t work as your typical Rockstar title, though it seems to be filling that role out of obligation anyway. This is an adventure game at heart, and as flabbergasted as I am to find myself admitting this, it’s this aspect of L.A. Noire that shows the most promise. The campaign has us following Cole Phelps, a World War II veteran who’s now making his way through the ranks as an LAPD detective. Each case has us following leads through various locations and scouring crime scenes for clues. It’s very point-and-click in nature, with players examining every object in the vicinity as Cole keeps a detailed journal of suspects, places of interest, and items that may be of aid in the investigation.
L.A. Noire’s first mistake in this regard is that it’s too hand-holding. Musical cues will alert players when an object can be examined, or when an item holds significance, or when they’ve found all of the clues in the area, and Cole will flat-out tell us when the object we’re examining is irrelevant to the case. Some of these hints can be turned off, and I recommend you do so, because there’s an internal puzzle at the heart of L.A. Noire’s toughest cases, and it’s genuinely satisfying to put the pieces together with as little help as possible. What’s intriguing about the setting is that it asks us to play detective in a pre-technology world where nothing comes easy. When a suspect may have written something on a notepad, Cole shades over the top page with a pencil to unveil the most recent message. When he gets a license plate number, he reports it via pay phone and then waits for a sighting; when he’s notified that the car's been spotted, he needs to head to that location as soon as possible or the lead is lost for good.
Of course, L.A. Noire’s investigations are really just setup for the game’s true core: its interrogations. When interviewing suspects and people of interest, players are tasked with deciphering whether they’re being cooperative or deceitful. If you accuse them of lying, you need to root through your clues and present evidence to disprove whatever they’ve said. When you can’t back up your accusations, you can either choose to be trusting or doubtful of what they’re saying, based largely on their body language and facial expressions.
That last part may have sounded a little ridiculous, since this is a video game, but hear me out. One of L.A. Noire’s most talked-about features is the implemented of something called “MotionScan” to capture the performances of its actors. I’m not sure how it works, but it succeeds where so many other video games have failed by confidently bounding over the Uncanny Valley and presenting us with character models that look and act like real people. As with all recent Rockstar games, L.A. Noire’s writing is excellent, and now we can enjoy it without being distracted by glassy eyes and nutcracker mouths. It’s incredible.
So L.A. Noire actually gets off to a solid start. Taking the time to conduct a thorough investigation holds its rewards when you’re able to verbally back a suspect into a corner, and the performances of the game’s surprisingly star-studded cast (John Noble!) shine through thanks to this crazy MotionScan sorcery.
And then the game slowly but steadily stumbles downhill. It starts when Cole is promoted to the Homicide desk. We’re tasked with investigating a succession of murders that are all clearly the work of a serial killer, based on the manner in which the victims are killed and their corpses defiled. But it would be slow and excruciating for a series of murder cases to go cold in the hunt for one guy, so instead, every individual case presents us with a handful of suspects. Conveniently, each behaves suspiciously, each frequently lies while being interviewed, and each is in possession of proof of guilt that, yeah, could very easily have been planted. And then Rockstar asks us to charge one of the suspects using our best judgment, even though they’re both obviously innocent and we’re just stalling until our inevitable confrontation with the real bad guy.
Boy, does that knowledge ever suck the satisfaction out of piecing together a puzzle and using quick words to outwit suspects. What’s even more maddening is that each case still has a “right” and “wrong” result, and getting a good rating for a case ultimately just comes down to guessing which of the suspects your superior would rather see locked up. At one point, I was forced to choose between charging the husband of a victim and a pedophile who was probably just in the wrong place at the wrong time. My partner pointed out that it’s the latter who really needs to be taken off the streets regardless of the investigation’s results, yet the husband had far more evidence weighing against him. An interesting moral dilemma, no? I picked the husband, and my captain chewed me out, dismissing the evidence (which included a blood-stained jacket, belonging to the victim, in the trunk of her husband’s car) as “happenstance.” Bam, two-out-of-five-star case rating.
And then, in the very next scene, the very same man reported that the DA “couldn’t be more happy” with the evidence and the motive. And this is all unfolding with the knowledge that the real killer is someone else entirely. God, Rockstar.
And so L.A. Noire has fallen into the same trap as Heavy Rain and nearly every other adventure game before it, in that it exists solely to tell a story. That, in this medium, is inexcusable. But the one thing Heavy Rain got right was that, for as slow and tiresome as it was, its deviously twisty plot almost made it worth the struggle. L.A. Noire, on the other hand, presents a number of interesting detective-game mechanics and introduces new means for conveying cinematics in a video game, and it’s all in service of a story that, frankly, isn’t very good.
I’m trying to avoid outright spoilers here, but Cole’s pursuit of the serial killer couldn’t possibly end on a less satisfying note. After the bodies have piled up, we’re sent on a wild goose chase through Los Angeles as the perpetrator leaves riddles at major landmarks, accompanied by pieces of evidence taken from all of his murders (which – shock! horror! – all ended with Cole wrongly convicting someone). After running all over town for a good half hour, you’d think we’d be gearing up for a major reveal, something comparable to, say, the finale of Dexter’s first season. But no. The killer is just some NPC you talked to once, and the confrontation is just another chase scene followed by another gunfight. And then you kill him and the matter is dropped without the slightest explanation of his motives.
Why did he kill those people? Why did he strip them naked and write cryptic messages on their bodies with lipstick? Why did he leave Cole and his partner a series of clues leading to his location only to get angry when they show up and start waving around a shotgun? All of these questions go unanswered – unless I’m seriously missing something here – and even the matter of Cole wrongly charging innocent suspects is given the most ramshackle resolution you could imagine. And then the matter is dropped and L.A. Noire’s plot goes in a completely different direction.
So the game has a great concept, sacrifices it to tell a story, and the story isn’t all that good to begin with. Cole’s former comrades eventually play a major role in the plot, as does the fact that they saw some pretty sinister stuff while on duty in Japan, but Rockstar didn’t need to waste our time with so many flashbacks just to establish that. On the other hand, Cole’s personal issues take a major toll on his job late in the game, and this comes out of nowhere simply because his day-to-day life had been given the short shrift throughout. The fact that Cole has a wife and kids isn’t even mentioned until the second disc, and we don’t even see his wife until the third, when his personal problems are suddenly relevant to the plot.
This all just comes to show what a big, overlong miscalculation L.A. Noire is. It has the ingredients of an engaging detective game but then hastily shoves them aside in favor of drama, and it has a tight script and the best motion capture work in the business, all to present a story that’s meandering, unfocused, and anticlimactic. L.A. Noire’s plot and gameplay both seem to exist to service the other, and neither works.
Yet for everything I hate about L.A. Noire, I’m still inclined to kinda-sorta recommend it, if only because it presents a promising direction for this genre. Heavy Rain had a good story, yet it had no excuse for existing other than to tell that story, even if it had to waste my time with boring quick-time events and mundane activities just to qualify – at least by some standards – as a video game. L.A. Noire would have worked better as a series of unrelated cases, as I’d have loved to see the game’s detective mechanics truly blossom without the pressure of having to stick to the rails of a consistent story. Quantic Dream should take note: L.A. Noire may fail as a game, but at least it tries to be one.
Rating:
|
|
|
|
More Reviews by Suskie
|
|
 |
Metro: Last Light (PC)
With every journey to the surface, the Moscow skyline is presented as something awe-inspiring yet imposing, and yet it is only ever seen through the cracked vis... |
 |
XCOM: Enemy Unknown (PC)
Whoops! Did you forget to upgrade your interceptors? Because now there's a UFO over Russia that you're not equipped to take down, and transferring or manufactur... |
 |
The Walking Dead: Survival Instinct (Xbox 360)
The game spooked me on a couple of occasions and frequently almost has enough atmosphere to make its many shortcomings worth overlooking, but then you co... |
If you enjoyed this L.A. Noire review, you're encouraged to leave feedback and talk about it with members of the site's community. You don't even need an HonestGamers account to get involved in the discussion. Please remember to keep your comments respectful and on-topic or they may be deleted by a moderator. Thank you for your understanding!
comments powered by Disqus
Info | Help | Privacy Policy | Contact | Advertise | Links
© 1998-2013 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. L.A. Noire is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to L.A. Noire, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors.
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. L.A. Noire is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to L.A. Noire, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors.