Rush'N Attack Ex-Patriot (Xbox 360)

Rush'N Attack Ex-Patriot review

Game: Rush'N Attack Ex-Patriot
Platform: Xbox 360
Genre: Action
Developer: Vatra

Reader review by pickhut

April 13, 2011

If you've never heard of Rush'n Attack, then this is basically what the game is: Contra with a knife. Even though it predates Contra, that's really the best description. You probably think this sounds like crap, but it actually is a pretty challenging title, given the fact you have to get up close and personal due to the limited range of the default weapon. And who do you fight with such a weapon? Russians. Lots and lots of Russian soldiers that want nothing but to punch your face in, fire bullets through your head, parachute in with rifles, and blow your ass away with rockets.

Notice the play on words yet?

In a decade where many releases had a manly slant, Rush'n Attack was the Rocky IV of video games.

26 years later, we would finally receive a sequel to this almost-forgotten title, that is, if you discard M.I.A. as the original follow-up. And, keeping with a recent trend from Konami, it ends up being something completely different from its predecessor, only maintaining bits and pieces to tie the games together. Instead of a manly side-scroller, Ex-Patriot is a linear Castletroid that uses Metal Gear stealth elements. That's one hell of a leap. Okay, forget for a moment these new mechanics pretty much alienate fans of the original's style, and let's ask the 800 MS Points question: is it fun? I'll just say that, in the six-ish hours I've played the game (completed in five), I had nearly zero sense of satisfaction. For me, there were only two memorable moments in the entire product.

Moment one occurs during the opening narrative, when the voice-over says "You are one sneaky bunch of ninja badassess."

Moment two happens when I was told to find a laser. Minutes later, I discovered a switch that, upon flipping, triggered a cutscene in which a ginormous laser cannon pops out of thin air and blows open two locked doors. It was a normal doorway. It was an unnecessary, yet awesome moment.

Ex-Patriot's downfall is that it plays like a beginner's stealth game; you literally repeat the same methods over and over again once you realize what works. At first, it's neat sneaking up on Russian guards and breaking their necks, pulling soldiers off railings and then stabbing their balls, and luring idiots towards doorway hiding spots (a la Rolling Thunder), but once you realize you can get through the entire game using these three tactics, it sucks the fun out of everything. Doesn't help that guards have Genome Soldier Vision, where they'll be standing five feet away and can't even notice another soldier being murdered by a weird guy wearing an X face mask.

I hate having to compare Ex-Patriot to Metal Gear Solid 1, but they have the closest similarities. However, and I can't believe a game is making me say this, MGS1 has better play mechanics and enemy AI. At least in that title, you get actual variations in gameplay, like having to guide missiles and sniping battles. Also, the guards actually investigate strange happenings, like dead bodies lying around. The soldiers in Ex-Patriot probably don't get paid enough to give a damn, and the only "changes" in game flow is having to search for items in order to progress, which happens a lot. Another goof that needs to be brought up about this Rush'n Attack sequel is that it's a MGS-style stealth game with a side viewpoint. That alone makes things amazingly limited. Someone on staff must have thought it would've been a brilliant idea, only to crap himself silly halfway through development when he realized it was really an awful concept.

Hilariously, after completing the game, I replayed it on the hardest difficulty, and guess what? Still easy and boring. Funny thing, in an attempt to make Ex-Patriot interesting, I damned the stealth aspects and rushed enemies most times... and I hardly had any challenge. Oddly, the development team felt the need to add a setlist of combos to perform in combat. I need to stress the fighting in this game isn't difficult at all, so I hardly bothered trying different combos and just stuck with "X, X, Block, X, X, Block" maneuvers. It's such a far cry from the simple, yet chaotic nature of the original title, where, there were times when you would have Russians charging from both sides, a ninja soldier ready to jump kick your ass, and a mortar shell coming in from above. And you would have a great sense of accomplishment escaping this madness without a scratch.

26 years later... we got a sequel that holds your hand and encourages hiding in the dark.

26 years later, we got Rocky V.


Rating: 3/10


More Reviews by pickhut
Rhythm Heaven Fever (Wii)
Rhythm Heaven Fever (Wii)
"As long as you have fun, that's the main thing."
FlingSmash (Wii)
FlingSmash (Wii)
Seeing it from a general consumer's point of view, it's easy to understand why one would pass: an unknown IP starring what looks like a smiley-faced dodgeball w...
ESWAT: Cyber Police (Arcade)
ESWAT: Cyber Police (Arcade)
Perhaps the dorkiest protagonist to come out of Sega.


Feedback

If you enjoyed this Rush'N Attack Ex-Patriot review, you're encouraged to leave feedback and talk about it with members of the site's community. You don't even need an HonestGamers account to get involved in the discussion. Please remember to keep your comments respectful and on-topic or they may be deleted by a moderator. Thank you for your understanding!

comments powered by Disqus


Info | Help | Privacy Policy | Contact | Advertise | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2013 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Rush'N Attack Ex-Patriot is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Rush'N Attack Ex-Patriot, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors.

Follow Us