"Aside from being counter-intuitive, these moves feel like a chore. In any other game, even some really bad games, the wave-your-hand-like-you-just-donít-care attacks are active at all times. It might not make much sense to waste time attacking when thereís nothing to attack. But thatís what gamers are used to. Weíve become accustomed to certain elements, primarily those that allow us to do whatever we want, whenever we want."
Thereís a reason why licensed games Ė those that originated from a non-video game property (such as books, movies, and TV) Ė have an ongoing stigma against them. You can blame it on the overly high expectations that come with such a title, but the fact of the matter is that most of these games suck. If theyíre not boring, theyíre problematic. If theyíre not problematic, theyíre not playable. And if theyíre not playable, who in their right mind would ever go near them?
Code Lyoko: Quest for Infinity, the second game based on the fairly popular Code Lyoko series, has a better heritage than most. Having already impressed gamers with a solid release on the Nintendo DS, Quest for Infinity was able to dodge some of the fears associated with these kinds of games. The promoted content Ė four playable characters, Wii-exclusive enemies, motion controls Ė gave it another edge over, say, The Golden Compass. Or 24, Alias, Catwoman, Superman or any of the other lousy, property-butchering titles released in the past two years.
The problem with Code Lyokoís initial success is that it set a new standard. The problem with standards is that we feel every mistake when they are not met. Like so many games in this scenario (even those without an exterior license), Quest for Infinity suffers greatly from its inability to deliver what we crave. But that isnít the only place where things went wrong.
Building on the seriesí premise, Quest for Infinity stars Ulrich, Yumi, Odd and Aelita, four heroes dedicated to saving the world. To accomplish that goal, theyíll travel Ė via computer Ė to a world thatís reminiscent of The Matrix, minus the ongoing threat of being eaten alive by strange creatures and man-made machines. You are in danger, but the danger isnít immediate. Most enemies are tame, some are stationary, and others come dressed in a large suit of armor to appear more ferocious than they really are. Itís nothing a flick of the wrist canít take care of.
At first, the controls seem pretty competent. Using the Wii remote and nunchuck attachment, Quest for Infinity moves like any other action/adventure. The thumbstick controls your characterís movements while the A button is used for jumping. Odd and Aelita, the only two characters that are capable of firing projectiles, should remind players of the last Chicken Little game. Simply point the remote at the screen and tap the 'B' button to fire. Itís not rocket science, but thereís no room for complaints. Projectiles are an invaluable tool, and not just because of the attack benefits. They will also help solve the door and force field puzzles, a task youíll be performing often.
If you could stop there and walk away, the game would make a nice Virtual Console download. But as a full-fledged release, youíre bound to keep playing, and thatís when the motion sickness begins to develop. Quest for Infinity is one of those titles that fell victim to the belief that you canít be a Wii game without utilizing its motion functionality. Itís true, we do expect it, frequently request it, and are often disappointed when a game doesnít have it. But itís much worse to throw in a dozen shaking and pointing mechanics just to fill a quota or to have something to say in a press release.
Ulrichís primary attack, which is executed by holding the 'B' button and shaking the remote, must be performed at close range. Thatís not exactly a sweeping statement, but thereís a catch. You can only perform the attacks when standing near an enemy or destructible object. The same is true for Yumi, whose projectile attack is only active when in the presence of an enemy. Odd and Aelita can fire their projectiles any time they wish, but Yumi cannot.
Aside from being counter-intuitive, these moves feel like a chore. In any other game, even some really bad games, the wave-your-hand-like-you-just-donít-care attacks are active at all times. It might not make much sense to waste time attacking when thereís nothing to attack. But thatís what gamers are used to. Weíve become accustomed to certain elements, primarily those that allow us to do whatever we want, whenever we want. You donít need to jump all the time in Super Mario Bros. But can you imagine what the game would have been like if Nintendo had only allowed us to do so when standing near a platform?
Not satisfied with the usual shake-to-attack implementation, Quest for Infinity goes the extra step by applying other motion-based moves. Need to climb a massive structure by hopping between two walls? Shake the remote and try to ignore the voices in your head.
Wait, not that way, the other way. No, youíre doing it wrong. Stop, youíre gonna fall again! Canít you get it right? Ahhhhhh!
Need to build a bridge? Point to the dots on the screen and slowly drag the remote across them. Slower. Really slow! Darn, now youíve messed up! Whatís wrong with you?
Hey, is that a thin, tightrope-inspired area that has to be crossed? It looks like you need to hold the remote steady to keep from falling off. Go slow. SlowerÖand steadier! Oh youíre never going to get it. Why donít you just give up?
Quest for Infinity seeks redemption in the form of a Star Fox-style mini-game where you explore the digital sea. This on-rails shooter controls surprisingly well. That could be attributed to lack of nunchuck involvement. Youíll use the remote to point and fire, similar to a lightgun shooter. But the pointer also moves your ship, which must evade enemy attacks.
Unfortunately, the thrills donít last. Again, you canít attack outright Ė you must hold the 'B' button to lock-on to enemy ships, and then release to fire. You might think you can just rapidly press the 'B' button to fire, since that is what our industry has taught us. That would have likely been the case if this game had bothered to follow the rules, or good-old fashioned logic.
While Quest for Infinity has its share of motional conundrums, the game is completely without a movable camera. Sure, it moves Ė on its own. You canít tweak it, influence it, or alter it in any way. Looking back, we all can come up with a great game or two that did the same thing. This one, however, seems to have been designed with a little guidance in mind. When walking toward the edge of any of the gameís strange worlds, you will see the camera jerk and spin in opposite directions. Itís as if the camera wants the player to take charge. But you canít. All you can do is watch as the view changes spontaneously and incoherently, jittering occasionally but with an inconsistent pattern like a guy that doesnít know when to stop chugging Red Bulls.
The final blow is dealt by dull and repetitive level designs, boring missions, and a bland display of visuals. I could see where diehard Code Lyoko fans would be amused by the story, which fosters character discussions with an easy point-and-click system. But you wouldnít watch a TV show when seeking interactive content, so why buy a game if all you really desire is another episode of Code Lyoko?
Freelance review by Louis Bedigian (January 08, 2008)
A bio for this contributor is currently unavailable, but check back soon to see if that changes. If you are the author of this review, you can update your bio from the Settings page.
If you enjoyed this Code Lyoko: Quest for Infinity review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!