 |
Final Fantasy Legend (Game Boy) review"For example, in the very first world, all a player has to do is go to three castles and get a specific item from each king to open the next few floors of the tower for exploration. One king gladly does so if the party kills a local bandit living in a tiny cave. Another fights the party for his treasure in what could be considered a mini-boss fight. The third is assassinated, leaving the party to slaughter the weak usurper and claim the third item. All of this could be done in 15 minutes — if I hadn’t had to spend a good hour or so fighting monsters to earn money for equipment and to build up my humans." |
I was drawn to console role-playing games back in their early days of existence, long before they became commonplace. The aura of vastness these games had intrigued my imagination and, in my eyes, none seemed more immense than the Game Boy’s Final Fantasy Legend.
Picture a tower. Not just any tower, but one that, in essence, serves as a hub between worlds. By climbing this massive building, supposedly to reach a land of paradise at the top, one is actually traveling from one world to another. I found this an intoxicating concept and couldn’t wait to play.
And as a result, I wound up muddling through a game that has to rank highly on Overdrive’s List O’ Great Disappointments. Thanks to an interview I read which said the impetus for this game’s creation was that an RPG-loving Nintendo executive wanted a portable one he could play through on the three-hour flight from his company’s Japanese headquarters to its American branch, I had an inkling the game’s “vastness” was an illusion. However, its other failings were what really ruined this game for me.
When a company feels the need to utilize false advertising to sell a game, it makes one wonder if they were that confident in their effort’s merits. Regardless of what the name insinuates, Final Fantasy Legend has nothing to do with the actual Final Fantasy series, other than being created by Square. But in the days of the Game Boy, it seemed any Square game with RPG elements got that name tossed onto it, so the first Mana game was called Final Fantasy Adventure and the first three games of the Saga series got the FFL moniker.
Far more important is that all three of FFL’s character classes have crippling flaws that detract from any possible enjoyment I may have gotten from the game. With this set of humans, mutants and monsters on your side, advancing through these worlds can become extremely frustrating. Just take a look.....
Humans are high-maintenance. Unlike most RPGs, characters don’t gain experience points and level up. Instead, humans are expected to buy their improvements. Vast amounts of money will be spent to give them more hit points, as well as improve their strength and agility. On top of this, nearly all weapons in the game can only be used a finite number of times (50 or fewer for the most part), meaning that players will have to spend tons of money on those, as well as stat enhancements. A four-character party loaded with humans will have trouble advancing throughout the game, as they’ll be spending hours upon hours of time fighting endless random battles just to earn money to stay afloat.
Mutants are messed-up. You only have to buy these guys weapons, as they gain their stats through combat experience. Using various weapons and abilities raises their strength, agility and mana (magic power), while simply being in fights and taking damage raises their hit points. The problem is that this is all pretty random. I’ve heard complaints by some people that their mutants wound up worthless as they’d scarcely gain anything and wind up as pathetic weak links. As for me, I had the opposite problem. My two mutants gained power at an amazing rate and dwarfed my humans for nearly the entire game. I was beating major bosses in one turn solely because my mutants were way too strong for that stage of the game.
Monsters are miserable creatures. On the surface, they’re an intriguing idea, as they start out weak, but can evolve into powerful creatures by eating the bodies of fallen foes. Unfortunately, this process is as random as that involving the growth of mutants, which leads to a lot of frustration during any of the multitude of times a decent monster will chow down on some meat and transform into a pathetic early-game foe with no useful abilities. Even worse, unless a monster has a great ability or two, they likely will be FAR inferior to the average, well-maintained human or mutant. Intriguing idea or not, these critters are nothing more than liabilities.
And, sadly, the game itself did nothing to take my mind off how poorly programmed characters are. Of the 20-plus floors of the tower, nearly all are tiny, meaningless chambers. Four contain actual worlds, but they really don’t offer that much. For example, in the very first world, all a player has to do is go to three castles and get a specific item from each king to open the next few floors of the tower for exploration. One king gladly does so if the party kills a local bandit living in a tiny cave. Another fights the party for his treasure in what could be considered a mini-boss fight. The third is assassinated, leaving the party to slaughter the weak usurper and claim the third item. All of this could be done in 15 minutes -- if I hadn’t had to spend a good hour or so fighting monsters to earn money for equipment and to build up my humans.
I could go on with complaint after complaint, such as how it seems there’s only a dozen or so constantly repeated designs for regular monsters or how the special abilities of mutants are changed on what seems a fight-by-fight basis, making it near-impossible to count on them for anything but melee combat as a killer offensive attack could be replaced with an utterly worthless ability at any time -- but all that would do is bloat this review. To put it simply, while FFL had a lot of potential, it’s just a really bad game. I found the concept behind the game to be ambitious and one that still intrigues me, but the execution is so flawed that this game wound up being impossible for me to enjoy.
Rating:
|
|
|
|
 |
Staff review by Rob Hamilton (September 07, 2007)
Rob Hamilton is the official drunken master of review writing for Honestgamers. |
|
More Reviews by Rob Hamilton
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If you enjoyed this Final Fantasy Legend review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!
You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.
© 1998-2015 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Final Fantasy Legend is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Final Fantasy Legend, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Final Fantasy Legend is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Final Fantasy Legend, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.