CivCity: Rome (PC) review
"With your first attempts at construction, you can only make tiny huts barely suitable for habitation. Residents demand a well, but theyíll only travel so far to reach it (apparently, crossing the entire city is just too much of a hassle and will prompt them to move to a city other than yours for the sake of eventual convenience)."
Itís kind of difficult to review CivCity: Rome because itís taking two great things--Civilization IV and SimCity--and mixing them, yet not really resulting in anything particularly remarkable. The game is neither astonishingly good nor bad in any noteworthy sort of way. Instead, itís just one of those experiences that youíll probably enjoy if you give it a shot, but that you wonít particularly miss if you donít.
Essentially, the game works like SimCity. Youíre given control over the development of an entire city with a finite amount of space. In this case, youíre on the Italian peninsula and youíre trying to build the next great civilization in the form of a single metropolis. Youíll start with a town center and build up around that, so that you quickly move from making use of resources like marble, stone, timber and iron to just collecting taxes while deciding what buildings go where.
The only two things that really prevent this from being a straight SimCity clone are the time period in which everything takes place, and the fact that as you build, youíll be able to research technologies that help your city grow more conveniently (you know, like in Civilization IV). Thatís either good if you liked the games that serve as the obvious source material, or bad if youíve played them so much youíre sick of them.
In the event that you fall into the former camp, well, thatís when CivCity: Rome becomes your game. Thatís when youíll enjoy placing housing close to the mines so that the workers have a place to ply their craft while you see to everything else. Thatís when youíll consider whether you have enough space to place a vineyard within range of the warehouse so that nearby wineries can grab some grapes to make their elixir. On and on it goes, with every choice you make building on the next.
The need to build everything up is paramount, of course. Thatís where things become a little bit of a see-saw. With your first attempts at construction, you can only make tiny huts barely suitable for habitation. Residents demand a well, but theyíll only travel so far to reach it (apparently, crossing the entire city is just too much of a hassle and will prompt them to move to a city other than yours for the sake of eventual convenience). So you build the well, but youíre not getting enough taxes from the pathetic shacks nearby and then you see that residents want someplace nearby that they can shop for sexy tunics. Only you canít just build a tunic shop, or else where would the fabric come from? So you have to build a place where you can grow the flax first, and you have to hope itís near enough to the vendor to be of use, and that--well, maybe youíre starting to get the idea.
CivCity: Rome is full of moments like that, which you must keep in check while youíre also making sure technology is sufficiently researched. And if you donít, then you donít collect enough in taxes and suddenly you canít build. And because you canít build, your population reaches an unnatural plateau and suddenly fate is conspiring against you while your city turns into an ancient ghost town. The very real possibility of that happening at any second is what adds tension to an otherwise slow-paced game. It can be downright exciting.
With that said, the game falls short of the mark in other areas. While itís fun to look at your city and the way the residents wander about performing their basic duties, the bustling feel you might expect isnít quite there. Itís more like an old game of Populous, where you see a few people wandering around and theyíre indicative of the cityís health as a whole. Thereís something to be said for that and the detail in some of the attractions (like how the geese play on the goose farm before they are slaughtered to feed your cityís most wealthy inhabitants), but at the same time there are moments where disappointment settles in. You look at an arena and a slain warrior melts into the ground, or you zoom in on a building and the textures look washed out. This is true even on ďHighĒ graphical settings.
The audio department does about as well as its visual brother. Digitized voice work sounds British, not Roman, and there are annoying reminders every time something changes within your city. Youíll be told whenever thereís an upward swing or a downward one in the happiness among your cityís residence. That should be useful, but it frustrates more than anything. The last thing you need when youíre trying to focus is a chipper voice telling you that your efforts are doomed and youíd dang well better do something about it. Rousing music provides more acceptable aural representation, but even that ends up feeling like the Roman equivalent of elevator music, and it doesnít seem to be linked to the on-screen action for the majority of the time.
Even so, CivCity: Rome ends up being a rather fun experience despite its faults, if only because it chose the right games to mimic. Itís difficult to recommend it at a full-price purchase, but itís also true that there arenít an abundance of simulation titles with this obvious pedigree. CivCity: Rome might not deserve to be the first game on your shopping list, but excluding it entirely would be a grievous oversight indeed.
Staff review by Jason Venter (September 11, 2006)
Jason Venter has been playing games for 30 years, since discovering the Apple IIe version of Mario Bros. in his elementary school days. Now he writes about them, here at HonestGamers and also at other sites that agree to pay him for his words.
If you enjoyed this CivCity: Rome review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!