Gundam Battle Assault 2 review

Game: Gundam Battle Assault 2
Platform: PlayStation
Genre: Fighting Action
Developer: Bandai

Reader review by lasthero

September 15, 2005

A Gundam battle is about fast-paced combat, on land, under sea, in the air. It is about incredible acrobatics, intense gunfights, heated duels. It’s about firing away with beams and bullets from afar, then closing the distance and hacking the enemy to pieces with a few slashes of the beam saber.

A Gundam battle isn’t about hand-to-hand combat. It isn’t about multi-hit combos or performing counters or executing throws or anything like that. As a matter of fact, with the exception of the G Gundam series, it’s rare to even see a Gundam throwing a punch.

That’s why Gundam Battle Assault 2 makes so little sense to me. It’s like it was made for the sole purpose of proving that a 2-D Gundam fighting game would suck.

The fighting system would be fine for a normal fighting game; it’s got everything you’d expect. Strong punch, weak punch, strong kick, weak kick, the standard arcade setup. Even the special attacks come out in traditional style; the button combinations are familiar to anyone who’s ever launched a Hadouken, almost identical to Street Fighter.

But that’s the problem; it’s a little too identical. It doesn’t feel like you’re controlling a fifty-ton, fifty-foot tall war machine, it feels more like Ryu found a damn good cosplay outfit and doesn’t know how to get out.

The models lumber around, walking at a sluggish pace, not even capable of upgrading to a run. The only sense of agility you can get is by tapping on the boost button and giving the thrusters a quick burst, letting your character go skyward for a short time. I put an emphasis on ‘short’, because the minute you realize how to use the boost and you start to get some hope for those daring aerial battles the series is known for, you also realize that the game’s putting limits on just how much you can fly around; you can only tap the boost up to three time before you burn out and have to charge up again.

And, as if the game’s just looking to rub it in, the AI takes advantage of your slowness and uses it to turn things on the cheap side. Its favorite tactic is making you run from one side of the stage to another, waiting until you can manage to walk over to the end and then boosting away, forcing you to turn around give chase. Yeah, you could activate the boost yourself and get there much faster, but you can’t exactly block when you’re soaring through the air, just asking for someone to unleash a beam in your face.

And when the AI isn’t playing a game of tag with you, it’s demolishing you with one of the game’s cheesy mini-bosses. Take the Big Zam for instance; a walking fortress that gave Amuro Ray quite a time in the original Gundam series. It doesn’t have the ability to block your attacks because...well, it doesn’t have arms. But then again, when you take up 2/3s of the screen and all you need to do to knock off half an energy bar is walk into your enemy, blocking isn’t all that needed. Because of the game’s silly focus on hand-to-hand combat, the only real way to engage him is by throwing blows. You barely even come up to his knees, he can literally walk you to death, and you’re trading blows with him. Right.

And to top that off, it doesn’t even look right. On the back of the case it proudly claims: Amazing Hand-Drawn 2D Graphics!. The graphics are a sight, I’ll give it that; the same styles you’d know from the show, with a little depth to push them out of the background and make them stand out. Pixilated, but not the worst you’d find on a PS game.

But then you see the models in motion. Not only do the Gundams fight like Ryu in a metal case, they move like it, too. They don’t seem like one whole unit, they walk in sections; when you move, it’s more like a bunch of barely joined pieces moving together, seamed. Gundams are supposed to be well-tuned weapon of wars, as mobile as the humans that pilot them. Battle Assault 2 doesn’t even begin to capture that.

To be fair, despite having a few models from the Gundam Wing and Universal Century shows, the main focus is on G Gundam, a series that pitted Gundams against each other in a glorified street tournament; fighting techniques used on a colossal scale. But that’s not really an excuse. G Gundam was a bad series for the same reason this is a bad game: It’s just not what Gundam is supposed to be.

I’d like to tag the standard ‘for fans of the series only’ line here, but if you’ve got a Gundam itch that needs scratching, there are many better games for it. If this game featured a headband wearing martial arts master and a police detective with the world’s largest legs, it might not be so bad. But with Gundams? Nah.

Rating: 3/10

More Reviews by lasthero
	Catwoman (Xbox) 99.999% of the people reading this review have either seen or heard about the horrendous Catwoman movie, and are coming into this review expecting it to ...
	Mass Effect (Xbox 360) The moment that made me realize Mass Effect was a great game came about thirty minutes in.
	Spider-Man 3 (Xbox 360) Gang wars take over the streets. An alien symbiote pops out of nowhere and gives him a new suit with incredible strength - but makes him a complete asshole. Kra...

Feedback

If you enjoyed this Gundam Battle Assault 2 review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one right here. Thank you for reading!

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

© 1998-2013 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Gundam Battle Assault 2 is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Gundam Battle Assault 2, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors.