"The idea that Americans need an ''easy'' RPG to introduce them to the genre is already quite insulting, especially considering that games like Wizardry have been around in the US far before anyone knew what Dragon Warrior was. It's no big wonder that RPGs in the early 1990's were ill-received, anyway; not only were they often primitive, monotonous affairs, but they were usually plagued with god-awful translations laden with ridiculous censorship. "
The idea that Americans need an ''easy'' RPG to introduce them to the genre is already quite insulting, especially considering that games like Wizardry have been around in the US far before anyone knew what Dragon Warrior was. It's no big wonder that RPGs in the early 1990's were ill-received, anyway; not only were they often primitive, monotonous affairs, but they were usually plagued with god-awful translations laden with ridiculous censorship.
Amazingly, none of these possibilities ever occurred to Square, which decided that the reason for poor RPG sales was because the US-released games were too difficult and complicated. Thus they happily set about paring their Final Fantasy series down to a more easily digestible game just for Americans. The five-man parties, semi-real-time battle system, and twisting story of the latest installment, Final Fantasy IV, were all thrown out the window. No, they wanted something simple. Nothing as complicated as that. And so they came up with Final Fantasy Mystic Quest, a game containing all the genre's weaknesses and very little of its strengths.
Not that one could fault Mystic Quest for not sticking with the typical Japanese RPG formula. As usual, you fill the role of a reluctant hero destined to save the world. He travels around, convince allies to join him, exploring dungeons with conveniently maze-like passageways, and does battle in the gentlemanly turn-based fashion. All the classic elements are in place - even the omniscient crystals Final Fantasy is famous for.
In fact, there are a number of improvements Mystic Quest made over its contemporaries. You can save your game anywhere, even when you're standing right in front of a boss, instead of at save points that are arbitrarily scattered about the world. Battles occur at predetermined spots, and you can see where the enemies are, a vast improvement over the relentless random battles other RPGs are fond of throwing at you. The in-game menus are elegant and well-designed (one of the few respects where simplicity actually pays off), not the convoluted mess that many games end up with.
Yes, Mystic Quest has all the elements of a classic 16-bit RPG. It's just such a pity that said elements are executed in such a half-hearted way that they border on pointlessness. Sure, other characters join the hero in his journey, but only one does so at a time, and they join and leave in an arbitrary, senseless fashion. They usually do have some background development, but their stories are immediately discarded the moment they leave your party.
Battling is no better. Monsters are so laughably weak - most succumbing to two physical attacks - that you are never in danger of dying. Despite having only two people in your party, battles seldom last more than three rounds. A simple Cure spell provides a complete HP refill. In the extremely, extremely unlikely event of both your characters being killed, you're even given the option of starting the battle over with no penalty whatsoever.
As if to squeeze out any last drop of challenge this game might have had, there are a number of senseless features that seemingly exist just to make things easier. Boxes that contain cure potions actually refill every time you exit and re-enter a location. You're spared the excruciatingly difficult task of exploring a world map, instead being forced to follow set paths marked by flashing arrows. And, should you ever feel the urge to bash on poor little defenseless monsters and grow even more absurdly overpowered, our considerate programmers provide numerous ''battlefields'' each containing ten monster encounters just for your convenience!
Thus, Mystic Quest fails in every purpose it might have been designed for.
As a tutorial for future RPG players, it fails. Any degree of strategy present in most RPGs, Mystic Quest lacks. A crucial element of the genre is exploiting various weaknesses of monsters - here, it just leads to even more pointless overkill. Another common element is choosing various equipment taking into account statistic bonuses and special effects - here, our hero can simultaneously reap the benefits of every single piece of armor he owns. Mystic Quest is simply barren of any challenge and requires no effort whatsoever be devoted to it, a poor preparation for a genre that often demands endless patience.
As a game to make RPGs more popular, it fails. Although it spares the player the tedium of walking in circles trying to gain a level, Mystic Quest introduces a different kind of monotony. The dungeon designs are as labyrinthine as ever (the only facet of the game that hasn't been simplified to hell and back, it seems), and gamers accustomed to fast-paced action games will not be impressed by the characters' slow walking speed. A bare-bones graphical look and near-nonexistent story offer nothing to reward the patient gamer willing to stick through with it. The brilliant soundtrack, perhaps the only thing Mystic Quest has going for it, is too little, too insignificant, to drastically change the outlook.
As a stand-alone game - well, failure may be too mild a word. Its simplicity and brainlessness, though certainly not a help, is not the whole problem with Mystic Quest; what's troubling is the complete lack of personality the game exudes. It seems content to be just a beginner's RPG, something that more experienced player is sure to scorn, when in truth it could have been so much more. It could have invented a fresh, simpler system to handle battling, instead of stripping an existing one down to its very bones. It could have taken a more lighthearted, original approach to the save-the-world story, instead of telling such a dumbed-down version of it it borders on self-parody. It could have been a enjoyable new experience to both veterans and rookies, instead of being a ghost of a game to the former and an unplayable mess to the latter.
Perhaps the only good to have come out of this game is that it proved Americans aren't that stupid - Mystic Quest did dismally both with sales and with critics. Square appears to have learned from the experience, for the next time it dared venture into the kiddie pool it was with an excellent game, Super Mario RPG, which was both simplistic enough for someone new to pick up and play, and original enough to please an experienced player. Eventually RPGs grew far more popular in the US, and by now most of them include detailed documentation and even in-game tutorials to help someone lost. In this age, Mystic Quest is unneeded - a relic of a bygone time when people didn't enjoy RPGs, and developers were foolish enough to think that a game like this would change their minds.
Community review by lurkeratlarge (January 21, 2004)
A bio for this contributor is currently unavailable, but check back soon to see if that changes. If you are the author of this review, you can update your bio from the Settings page.
If you enjoyed this Final Fantasy: Mystic Quest review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!