Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | AND | IOS | PC | PS4 | NS | VITA | WIIU | XB1 | All

Resident Evil 0: HD Remaster (PC) artwork

Resident Evil 0: HD Remaster (PC) review


"Traindead on arrival."


Resident Evil Zero attempts to answer a burning question that practically nobody ever asked: just what was Rebecca Chambers up to in the original game, before you found her? The thing is, a lot of you never witnessed the answer to that question, due to Capcomís short-lived Gamecube series exclusivity. Ignorance was a valid excuse for all but the seven people who owned that system, but it's a valid excuse no longer! As one of the newest members of the near dangerously obligatory HD remaster crowd, Resident Evil Zerohas since been splashed across all current platforms, with shinier graphics and that obsolete tank control scheme banished back to the late 90ís. Zeroís been elevated to its highest plane of existence to date. Itís still not very good.

I mean, itís not awful; itís just the victim of some really sloppy design choices. The sad thing is that it doesnít start out that way. During the pursuit of an escaped death row inmate, Billy Coen, Rebecca finds herself trapped on a runaway train filled with the undead. She has no choice but to team up with her quarry, and from there the two uneasy allies make their way through the claustrophobic cabins, given little room or time to react when any of the corpses slumped in their luxury seats reanimate and make spirited attempts to claw through the heroes' throats. Itís excellently paced; though the game never punishes you for taking your time, thereís a real sense of urgency. Youíre hurtling through the night to an unknown destination and, judging by the remains of the previous travelers, itís not a journey you should be excited about making. Tandem efforts to stop the train mean utilizing begrudging teamwork to bypass obstacles the other canít, or to find a way back to each other once separated. Thereís no wasted motion, no endless backtracking and no period where youíre meandering around, just trying to figure out what to do. The train is by far the highlight of the game, laser-focused into forcing the pair into a reluctant team and driving them to bond through their macabre discovers. Itís over in about half an hour.

Resident Evil 0: HD Remaster (PC) image


Then the rehashing starts. Directly after the train, youíre forced to go through a spooky old mansion, because thatís never been done before. The tour is highlighted by gothic architecture and ornate doors, the likes of which youíve seen before many times. Robbed of their urgency, the pair struggles to find reasons to remain a team as it lurches from one clichť patch of architecture to the next. A dilapidated church isnít entirely awful, but--and stop me if you heard this before--the majority of your time will be spent in an underground lab hidden beneath the mansion.

The heroes donít stay together for the sights; they stay together because two people were needed in order for Capcom to force upon players the worst inventory system anyone has ever implemented within a game. As in the older games within the series, thereís a lot of inventory-based puzzle littered around Zero, wherein you need to place that crest thing on that mantle or find a handle to turn that crank and so on. In fact, Zeroís puzzles probably dwarf that of the original, which is curious, as youíre not able to transport nearly as much. But, thatís weird, right? I mean, you have two people throughout the vast majority of the game, so shouldn't you be able to carry more? Well, no; after you arm them and give them an ammo supply and a healing item, your heroes have very little space left. Previous games introduced the magic chest storage system(TM) to try and work around such pitfalls. You had save rooms where you could dump your loot, to later access it from any other save room in the game. In Resident Evil Zero, you just drop stuff on the floor and hope you can remember where you left it.

Just give this scenario a bit of thought for a second: you find a key somewhere, and you know you need to use that key, because otherwise it wouldnít be glinting on the corner of that desk. But youíve yet to find a locked door. What are you to do? Do you take that key and eat up a precious inventory space? What if your inventory is already full? What do you sacrifice in order to take it? How about just leaving it there? Well, you could; you know where it is, but you know that you face agonising backtracking to reclaim it once you finally find the door it fits. But, even if you take it, odds are youíll need to backtrack anyway to reclaim the item youíve left behind. Things like healing herbs and bullets remain scarce and difficult to source, but youíll be dropping them at random points with distressing frequency, just so you can serve pack mule for plot-vital McGuffins.

Resident Evil 0: HD Remaster (PC) image



Itís telling that most tactical discussions youíll find on the Internet concerning Resident Evil Zero doesnít talk about ammo conservation, or the best way to take down boss-style monstrosities. Instead, they focus on how best to circumvent this awful inventory system. From mapping out hub rooms that give you the least amount of pointless backtracking, to ammo saving systems (which still means you need to sit through a couple of inventory screens every time someone empties a clip), thereís no rage-free way to sidestep it. After the train stops, thatís the entire experience. Itís a shame, too; Zero has its fair share of unique enemies, including a leech plague monster that really deserves featuring in a better constructed game. But then you face a horde of undead monkeys or bats, and that's a bit harder to take seriously.

For all the upgraded graphics, the tightened control scheme and the kooky extra modes included (run through the game as long-time series antagonist Albert Wesker, reveling in his overpowered glory!) , thereís not much reason to revisit Resident Evil Zero. That brilliant half-hour on the train aside, and even without factoring in the inventory issues, it remains a poorly written, ham-fisted attempt to squeeze an extra chapter into the franchiseís already ludicrous, over-spilling canon.


Project Horror 2016
Project Horror saw one (1) horror review submitted every day through the month of October. This review was part of that effort.










2/5

EmP's avatar
Staff review by Gary Hartley (October 09, 2016)

Gary Hartley arbitrarily arrives, leaves a review for a game no one has heard of, then retreats to his 17th century castle in rural England to feed whatever lives in the moat and complain about you.

More Reviews by Gary Hartley [+]
A Light in the Dark (PC) artwork
A Light in the Dark (PC)

Stockholm Syndrome Ė The Game
Knight Terrors (PC) artwork
Knight Terrors (PC)

Knight Run
Golem (PC) artwork
Golem (PC)

A girl and her magical rock-formed monstrosity

Feedback

If you enjoyed this Resident Evil 0: HD Remaster review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
joseph_valencia posted October 09, 2016:

I hate this game. It's the one classic-style Resident Evil I'll never revisit, and it's because of the stupid inventory system and character swapping mechanic. About the only thing it has going for it are some of the best pre-rendered environments ever made for a video game.
board icon
EmP posted October 10, 2016:

I've replayed three Resident Evil games to keep this streak alive. Worryingly, Res 0 was by far the best of the bunch. I still don't care for it at all, though.
board icon
Nightfire posted October 10, 2016:

Eviscerated. I dislike the RE series in general, and you've given me one more reason to heap onto the pile. Thanks! I think.
board icon
wolfqueen001 posted October 14, 2016:

Cool review. Shame the inventory system totally seems to ruin the game. Considering that's the bulk of the argument against it here, it really says something about how one lousily executed feature can impact the experience.
board icon
EmP posted October 18, 2016:

Thanks. Res 0 is probably worth playing if you're looking to complete the Resident Evil set, but beyond that I'd say probably skip it.

Except you, WQ. You should play it.

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

Policies/Ethics | Contact | Advertise | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2018 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Resident Evil 0: HD Remaster is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Resident Evil 0: HD Remaster, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.