Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | AND | IOS | PC | PS4 | NS | VITA | WIIU | XB1 | All

Dying Light (PC) artwork

Dying Light (PC) review


"It contains not a single new idea."


Dying Light (PC) image


When you spend a great deal of money on a new video card, you do so with the stubborn expectation that every game you play on your PC for the next several years will look gorgeous and run without a hitch. Then you play something like Dying Light. Widespread performance issues scream poor optimization, and no one can consistently nail down the root of the issue, whether it's exclusive to AMD cards, or whether it's an issue relating to view distance, or stemming from the number of cores the game is using, or whatever. Two weeks after release, when the collective nerd minds of the internet can't figure out how to get a game running properly, and when switching from the highest settings to the lowest settings barely has an effect on the awful framerate, it's time to accept that you've released a shoddy product.

So the PC version of Dying Light really wasn't fit for release – after a promisingly smooth opening sequence, we're set loose in the game's sandbox and feel blessed on the occasions when the game can hold 30fps for more than a second or two, or when a melee weapon can be swung without the game freezing up for a split second. This leaves me in the uncomfortable position of having to determine whether Dying Light hosts any value beyond its potentially temporary status as a technical fumble. When I finally threw up my hands in frustration over Dying Light's performance issues, did I do so with the hope of returning one day, discovering that the game had been properly patched, and unearthing its well-guarded entertainment value?

The answer is "no," though it comes with the qualifier that I seem to be a bit more sick of zombies than the rest of the world's population is. I note, however, that two of the best games of the last several years were zombie games: The Last of Us and Telltale's The Walking Dead. You'll note that both of these are heavily narrative-driven titles, because there's dramatic weight in a bleak scenario wherein it's possible to be eaten alive by your dead daughter or whatever. But zombies aren't interesting adversaries, as evidenced by Dying Light's insistence that you just ignore them whenever possible.

Dying Light (PC) image


Dying Light was developed by Techland, who also made Dead Island. I didn't play that, though I gather that it was considerably more vibrant than this. There are circumstances in which post-apocalyptic cities and drab color palettes go together, but Dying Light commits the cardinal sandbox sin of putting me in a world that I don't want to explore. Since this is a parkour-driven title, you're encouraged to use the environment to stay off the streets and thus avoid being mobbed by zombies, but I managed to do that without much parkour at all. These are largely the slow, middling variety of zombie, and thus it's surprisingly easy to just run right past them until action is awkwardly forced upon you at various points throughout the campaign (at which point the difficulty is directly proportional to how many skills you've unlocked, i.e. how much time you've spent in Dying Light's dull side quests).

For an original IP, Dying Light is shockingly low on ambition. It contains not a single new idea, and almost perfectly fits the model established by Ubisoft, a publisher now famous for design-by-committee. (Dying Light even has you climbing communication towers.) It's a grab bag of clichés. Weapon degradation, one two. Crafting system, three four. There's a lockpicking mechanic that's identical to the one used in Bethesda's games. There's a stamina meter, because that's "in" right now, but it only applies to combat. So our character can sprint indefinitely and scale vertical surfaces with no consequence, but the moment he's called upon to attack, it's three or four swings and he's out.

The platforming is fine, though Techland fails to make it a pivotal component of Dying Light, nor does the design of the city frequently reflect that this is supposed to be a core aspect of the game. One of my favorite releases of last year, Sunset Overdrive, was also a sandbox title set in a zombie-infested city with a major emphasis on staying off the ground, but that game's world design was a wonderland of networked platforming. Here, climbing buildings and navigating rooftops is just kinda something you can do if you want, and it'll usually slow you down, anyway.

Dying Light (PC) image


I mentioned earlier that zombies can still work as solid storytelling devices, which probably gave away the fact that Dying Light has very little narrative value. The game glosses over the initial outbreak and skips to point when zombies are pretty much an accepted thing. The main character is recruited by a group of survivors who all do that sandbox thing where they sit behind desks, put waypoints on your radar and then tell you that they won't trust you until you go chase some of those waypoints for a while. There's no urgency to a setting like that, and it feels irritatingly arbitrary almost immediately. Plus, these people seem to have plenty of guns, but it rarely seems to cross their minds to lend one of them to the guy they're sending out of the safe zones, particularly when melee weapons break so quickly and our protagonist can't swing any of them more than a handful of times before needing a recharge. (Further evidence that we're controlling the worst soldier in the world: he parachutes into the city, lands, and is incapacitated literally before he takes a single step.)

The writing walks the vast span between perfunctory and trite, the high/low points typically being the narration that fills the load times. When the protagonist (whose name, it will not surprise you to learn, I've forgotten) is sent on an early rescue mission only to discover that the man has turned, he says, "I didn't sign up for this!" What? You were airdropped into a zombie-infested quarantine zone! What did you sign up for, exactly? I appreciate that the game was given a Middle Eastern setting, but it's done a terrible injustice by characters that I'd hesitate to even call "one-note," because that implies that they have any notes to begin with.

None of this makes Dying Light bad – just generic. You know what does make the game bad? All of that, plus the maddening framerate issues that plague it on this particular platform. I don't see much appeal in the core experience of Dying Light to begin with, but that it's so off-puttingly choppy means that even those who find value in this celebration of zombie clichés should probably play it elsewhere or hold off altogether. If this is any indication, skipping Dead Island was probably a good idea.

Rating: 4/10


Suskie's avatar
Freelance review by Mike Suskie (February 12, 2015)

Mike Suskie is a freelance writer who has contributed to GamesRadar and has a blog. He can usually be found on Twitter at @MikeSuskie.

More Reviews by Mike Suskie [+]
Inside (PC) artwork
Inside (PC)

Inside forgoes answering questions that, in Limbo, we were never asking to begin with.
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End (PlayStation 4) artwork
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End (PlayStation 4)

Still generally a blast to play, and aided, as usual, by Naughty Dog's mastery of the latest technological leaps.
Dark Souls III (PC) artwork
Dark Souls III (PC)

Transparently built as a crowd-pleaser, but it feels like an amalgamation of the series' best attributes.

Feedback

If you enjoyed this Dying Light review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
zidane1341 posted February 13, 2015:

4 out of 10?? are you serious?? What a bullshit score. This game is great. Wish I could take back the view but at least I know to blacklist this website because 4 out of 10 would be very boring to play and the parkour and survival horror has not been merged together like this before, idiot.
board icon
JoeTheDestroyer posted February 13, 2015:

...both of which get very old after about five hours.
board icon
EmP posted February 13, 2015:

...and nothing of value was lost.

I've noted somewhere on site (Joe's blog, maybe?) that I've been tracking this game for a while as a potential re-debut into the world of games not made in someone's bedroom but grew less enthused with each trailer released. Your review might as well have read ‘Dear Gary’ (don’t actually do this – people will talk) because it hits every last concern I’ve fostered. Dead Island was a game that I lost complete interest in less than halfway through because it was nothing but a rotating collection of doing the same thing over and over again – the more I saw of Dying Light, the more it reminded me of this. I figured that a kind of Dead Island/Mirrior’s Edge hybrid could have been quite cool, but I saw less and less of the latter as development went on. I’ll disagree with our new Cheetos chum and confess that this was a killer review.
board icon
JoeTheDestroyer posted February 13, 2015:

Yeah, I grew to not care much for this one after a while, and this is coming from someone who liked Dead Island. I'm also usually not one to gripe about narrative, but I feel like there were too many missed opportunities. And don't even get me started on the "romantic" implications between Crane and Jade. It smacked too much of the typical forced love interest subplot that nearly every horror novelist shoehorns into their stories (something I plan to blog about soon), sans a random sex scene.
board icon
joseph_valencia posted February 13, 2015:

^^^^ If you didn't like the Staff Review, then you should post your own user review explaining why the game is really awesome. That would be more productive than calling someone an idiot for disagreeing with you.
board icon
Suskie posted February 14, 2015:

There is no pleasing the Cheetos :(

We try and we fail, again and again.
board icon
JoeTheDestroyer posted February 14, 2015:

Also, if you're going to gripe, the score is probably the worst thing to whine about. Doing so basically says, "I didn't read the text and am freaking out over a number," even if that's not the case.
board icon
jerec posted February 14, 2015:

See, staff reviews need to rate on a scale of 7.9 to 10 or people get upset.

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

Policies/Ethics | Contact | Advertise | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2017 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Dying Light is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Dying Light, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.