Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Discord button  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | PC | PS4 | PS5 | SWITCH | VITA | XB1 | XSX | All

Forums > Submission Feedback > PaiMay's Street Fighter IV review

This thread is in response to a review for Street Fighter IV on the Xbox 360. You are encouraged to view the review in a new window before reading this thread.

Add a new post within this thread...

board icon
Author: Masters (Mod)
Posted: December 30, 2010 (11:11 AM)
Actions: Register for a free user account to post on the forums...

Hi there. Welcome to HG (assuming you're new here).

Normally, a review like this would not be approved, and it's not because of any lack of quality insofar as your actual writing skills go--you're clearly competent enough at communicating your thoughts.

The issue I have with your review is in how it works (or doesn't) as a... review.

It seems you have fighting game knowledge, and enthusiasm, and you have strong opinions about various fighting game canons; but you actually say precious little about this PARTICULAR GAME, and why it deserves a 9/10 (and your recommendation).

I'd like to see you tighten up the wandering blog-like discussion of the genre in general, and spend more word count instead tackling the merits of SFIV in particular.

If you're out there, I'd love to hear your thoughts.


I don't have to prove I'm refined - that's what makes me refined!

board icon
Author: Leroux
Posted: December 30, 2010 (02:06 PM)
Actions: Register for a free user account to post on the forums...

I agree with the above. I'd like to point out an example:

"I'm not going to waste time comparing SFIV to any of the previous games that have come before it in this awesome fighting series."

This sounds like an interesting and new approach (although I wouldn't say it would be a waste of time to do so), but it renders a later line like this completely unconvincing:

"I love nostalgia as much as the next guy, but this game really is, apart from in a few small ways, better than all of its predecessors."

That's a bold claim, and needs to be supported, but it isn't and leaves more questions from the review than answers.

board icon
Author: PaiMay
Posted: December 31, 2010 (08:28 AM)
Actions: Register for a free user account to post on the forums...

Thanks for the feedback, I'll get on it and tighten up that review. Btw I'm not new, just a long time lurker. Hope you enjoy my ypdated review a little more.


So, you wanna fight? Fight me!

board icon
Author: zigfried
Posted: January 01, 2011 (09:40 PM)
Actions: Register for a free user account to post on the forums...

The update is quite a bit clearer than the original draft. Nicely done.

//Zig


Not sure how to make a sig? While logged into your account, you can edit it and your other public and private information from the Settings page.

board icon
Author: radicaldreamer
Posted: January 01, 2011 (11:09 PM)
Actions: Register for a free user account to post on the forums...


Factual corrections:

-The Focus attack by itself does not drain the super bar at all.

-Supers cannot be canceled with focus attacks, only special moves and normals can, which consumes two EX bars.

Also some typographical/grammatical errors:

"...making it a worth successor..."

"...you van trade off Fireballs..." (also, fireball doesn't need to be capitalized)

"this allows you too" (to)


Not sure how to make a sig? While logged into your account, you can edit it and your other public and private information from the Settings page.

board icon
Author: PaiMay
Posted: January 04, 2011 (07:03 AM)
Actions: Register for a free user account to post on the forums...

thanks for picking out my spelling errors, really.

Yeah I actually meant special moves, but it's hard to keep up with what is called what sometimes, especially when you're tired, like I was when I wrote the update. Anyhoo....


So, you wanna fight? Fight me!

User Help | Contact | Ethics | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998 - 2025 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.