And after I spent seven hours messing with it: my DirectTV Receiver doesn't support HDTV, which explained why the picture quality was horrible compared to my old TV that I had for over 10 years.
Screw it, I'm not charging extra for a HDTV Receiver, this TV is going back tomorrow...
Most recent blog posts from Wendell B... | |
Feedback | |
![]() |
WilltheGreat - February 21, 2009 (10:42 AM) Yeah, they don't tell you that when they advertise how great HDTV is, do they? |
![]() |
bluberry - February 21, 2009 (12:46 PM) do you even watch that much TV? and how much extra is an HDTV receiver? I have cable and an HD box is like 6 bucks a month extra, totally worth it. and your videogames will look tits on it. |
![]() |
dementedhut - February 21, 2009 (03:58 PM) TV's on almost all the time, but I really watch about 7 or 8 hours a week. I can deal with not having a HDTV for a little bit more, the only reason I bothered trying to get one is because the TV I have been using since 1998 looks like it's about to die out on me. |
![]() |
True - February 21, 2009 (09:02 PM) and your videogames will look tits on it. Mine looks tits, ass and pu-nani. I put out $1000 for a very nice 42" Sony Bravia and the moment I actually turned my PS3 on to play the demo for RE 5 I realized I would have undoubtedly payed twice as much for it. If you're a big tv guy, then it's probably a wise idea to get either an HD receiver or to return the TV. If you got it strictly for video games like I did, I would hang on to it. It's fucking gorgeous with the right cable. |