Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Discord button  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | PC | PS4 | PS5 | SWITCH | VITA | XB1 | XSX | All

Pokémon SoulSilver Version (DS) artwork

Pokémon SoulSilver Version (DS) review

"I ran out and bought Pokémon SoulSilver on launch day, and it sucks that I have to describe this course of action as having “caved.” I liked it when I was able to purchase these games without feeling ashamed of myself. "

I ran out and bought Pokémon SoulSilver on launch day, and it sucks that I have to describe this course of action as having “caved.” I liked it when I was able to purchase these games without feeling ashamed of myself.

HeartGold and SoulSilver are the second set of remakes in a series that has already received ample criticism for not taking any significant steps forward, and they’re coming from a company that’s famous for repackaging old content to rake in guaranteed cash from both longtime fans and the new additions to their constantly-changing target audience. I can’t really fault Nintendo, though – to an extent, they’ve earned the massive pile of money they’re currently lounging on, because playing through this remake reminded me that after all this time, Pokémon is still an extraordinary series. The ludicrously open-ended combat options were once the foundation for communities of Game Boy-toting grade schoolers everywhere, and I have no serious qualm with the formula being rehashed on a regular basis since the formula works so well to begin with.

Even a rehash is new content, however. Nearly any series fanatic will tell you that Gold and Silver were the best generation of Pokémon games, for a multitude of reasons – timing was one of them ­– but their moment of glory is long behind them, due mainly to the eclipsing nature of this series. With each entry broadening the scope, why go back in time?

Nintendo probably knew this, and included a failsafe: the Pokéwalker. This pack-in gadget is a pedometer that doubles as something similar to a Tomagotchi, only a thousand times cooler. Any Pokémon you've caught over the course of the main adventure can be transferred wirelessly to the device, after which you can take it with you and accumulate "watts," which are earned from your total number of steps and are used to play mini-games, unlock new environments for strolling, and train your Pokémon.

I love it. It almost bridges the gap between the game world and the real one, as it allows you to remain entrenched in the Pokémon universe even when you're not playing. A Pokémon can only gain a single level for each trip to the Pokéwalker, so it's difficult to abuse the device, but I can't ignore that the concept of real-life grinding has been introduced here. And while the mini-games aren't especially creative, they work as momentary distractions. If you've got thirty seconds free, take the Pokéwalker off of your belt and try your hand at catching a wild Pokémon. If you succeed, for the rest of the day you'll be carrying a reminder on your waist about how excited you are to jump back onto your DS after you get home from work, school, or wherever you happen to be.

The games themselves are not nearly as fresh, and it shouldn't be surprising. The FireRed and LeafGreen remakes felt like pointless fan service at the time, yet even they proved bizarrely vital in retrospect: The first generation of Pokémon games to hit the DS (that would be Diamond and Pearl) were backward compatible with GBA titles only, and as such, with the original Game Boy cartridges out of the equation, players were dependent on the remakes if they wanted to import any of the creatures from the earlier adventures into their most up-to-date Pokédex. Between three generations of intertwining games, all 493 Pokémon were ultimately obtainable on one meager DS card, provided you had the resources, the time, and the level of commitment to acquire them all.

Part of what makes the release of HeartGold and SoulSilver such a non-event is that they lack the thrill of a new world to explore, new gym leaders to fight, and (especially) a new batch of Pokémon to collect. Maybe their relevance will become apparent over time – say, on a future Nintendo handheld that’s only backward compatible with DS titles – but for the time being, they’re merely like every other remake in existence: It's a pleasantly nostalgic trip, yet it’s impossible to ignore the fact that you’re paying for a game you’ve probably already played to death. They're unable to justify their existence.

Platinum, the recent younger sibling to the DS generation of titles, suffered from a similar problem. I’ll continue to invest my valuable free time in this series so long as Nintendo gives me a compelling reason to do so, as evidenced by the 170+ hours logged in my copy of Diamond. But while I can stomach a game being released in two slightly different versions to encourage networking, reissuing that game in an eventual third version that offers a few mostly negligible bonuses to late adopters – a series staple since Yellow – is slowly coming across more and more as a holdover. We’ll eventually have to face the fact that these remakes, reissues and third-pillar titles don’t add anything that wasn’t already there.

My point is that if “gotta catch ‘em all” is still this series’ mantra, then the true fanatics were finished a year or two ago, and have since been patiently waiting for the next expansion of the Pokémon universe to keep the craze going. Platinum wasn’t it, and HeartGold and SoulSilver aren’t it.

But as much as I tire of Nintendo’s lazy attitude, I do not tire of the games themselves. It’s especially interesting that Pokémon has long held the reputation of being a children’s franchise, since these are still some of the meatiest RPGs in existence; it’s telling that it was SoulSilver that dominated my free time in the same week that the new Final Fantasy game was released. I wish Game Freak would focus their efforts on developing new games, but then I bought SoulSilver on the day of its launch, which probably means they’re doing something right. Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to go for a walk.

Suskie's avatar
Community review by Suskie (May 24, 2010)

Mike Suskie is a freelance writer who has contributed to GamesRadar and has a blog. He can usually be found on Twitter at @MikeSuskie.

More Reviews by Suskie [+]
Inside (PC) artwork
Inside (PC)

Inside forgoes answering questions that, in Limbo, we were never asking to begin with.
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End (PlayStation 4) artwork
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End (PlayStation 4)

Still generally a blast to play, and aided, as usual, by Naughty Dog's mastery of the latest technological leaps.
Dark Souls III (PC) artwork
Dark Souls III (PC)

Transparently built as a crowd-pleaser, but it feels like an amalgamation of the series' best attributes.


If you enjoyed this Pokémon SoulSilver Version review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
wolfqueen001 posted May 26, 2010:

You make some interesting points, though I don't necessarily agree with them all. I considered the release of these two remakes as an opportunity to make catching the earlier generation pokemon a lot easier. Sure, you can catch all these pokemon if you have all the GBA cartridges and the like (and I do), but it's exceedingly difficult and time consuming. In fact, despite having all the 'resources' (with the exception of any sort of motivation to go to Nintendo events to collect the legendaries. Ugh. That's just too much), I've hardly made a dent in collecting all the old-school ones. To me, it'd just be easier to trade with one of these games rather than import from the GBA cartridge or try to catch them using that bizarre poke radar method or whatever.

That being said, I can't really say whether these games would actually be worth the price to someone who's played these games in their original form. While I don't have either remake myself, I am aware of all the new features because, at the risk of sounding super nerdy, I've watched youtube walkthroughs just to see whether I'd really be interested in the new games or not. I do like some of the new features such as the fact that you can rechallenge gym leaders pretty much as often as you like, but if put in retrospect, all these things really are kind of minor so might not be a huge sale. I actually found the Pokewalker thing ot be kind of lame, but it's cool you seem to like it.

Still, whether Nintendo is actually coming up with anything new or not - and in many ways, it really isn't - it kind of doesn't matter to me because when they do rehash something like this, there always seems to be a ton of extras that those exposed to the originals wouldn't get otherwise. But even so, I will admit that I probably won't invest in these until prices come down because I don't really feel like spending $50 on something like this. As much time as I've spent on the Pokemon portable gaming franchise over the years, it's really fallen out with me as I've grown older. I still find it fun, mind, and it's nostalgic as hell, but I'm less interested in getting anything new nowadays.

Truth be told, I'm surprised they can keep continuing the franchise at all. Have you heard about the genuinely new games coming out? Jesus Christ, I had to say to myself, it's like... how much more can they come up with? I actually grew exasperated with some of the pokemon in Diamond/Pearl because they just seemed like variations of similar pokemon in previous generations (well, more so than usual, anyway). But, well, it's a profitable enterprise, so I suppose they'll milk it for as long as there's interest.

Anyway, I sort of went on a huge tangent there. The review itself was fairly decent and provides some interesting discussion points, but probably wouldn't be very useful to someone new to the series. Of course, it's highly unlikely that anyone new to the series would read this review first oer others of different games... I imagine that anyone interested in HeartGold / SoulSilver would have had some prior exposure to the series beforehand. Either way, it really just goes to show that reviewing the Pokemon games is very tricky. I've tried a few times and just... sort of gave up because it wasn't saying what I wanted and how I wanted it said. So kudos to you for going for such a challenging game (in my opinion) to write about.
board icon
Suskie posted May 27, 2010:

Thanks. Yeah, I freely admit that this is more of a rant than a straightforward review. My stance was essentially that I'm not going to waste anyone's time describing in detail how these games work because it's pretty much common knowledge by now and I had more important things to discuss. I agree with the popular assertion that HeartGold and SoulSilver make good starting points for anyone who's new to the series, but how has that not apply to every generation of Pokemon games?

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

User Help | Contact | Ethics | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998 - 2022 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Pokémon SoulSilver Version is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Pokémon SoulSilver Version, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.