Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Discord button  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | PC | PS4 | PS5 | SWITCH | VITA | XB1 | XSX | All

Just Cause 2 (Xbox 360) artwork

Just Cause 2 (Xbox 360) review


"I don’t entirely know what Just Cause 2 is about. I know it concerns some islanders with very silly accents grouping up against a corrupt government, but I couldn’t delve into further details, nor even confirm the very presence of details at all. Come to think of it, I’m not even sure what the main character’s name is; I always called him Tuco, because he sounds exactly like Eli Wallach from The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. But never mind. What’s important about him is that he’s go..."

I don’t entirely know what Just Cause 2 is about. I know it concerns some islanders with very silly accents grouping up against a corrupt government, but I couldn’t delve into further details, nor even confirm the very presence of details at all. Come to think of it, I’m not even sure what the main character’s name is; I always called him Tuco, because he sounds exactly like Eli Wallach from The Good, the Bad and the Ugly. But never mind. What’s important about him is that he’s got a parachute pack and a grappling hook with absurd reach, and that the two in tandem work wonders of platforming magic. It’s never explained how at least a hundred yards of hefty retractable cable can be stored inside of a tiny arm-mounted device, nor why Tuco, still hamstrung by ammo limitations, never runs out of parachutes, yet this all contributes to the game’s inherent silliness. You get the feeling any explanation would just detract from the fun.

Just Cause 2 is a sandbox game, and it is as gargantuan a sandbox game as I’ve ever played. And I know sandboxes are always “huge,” but this one, set on the island of Panau, really is huge. There’s an enormous mainland with a snowy mountain range at its center, and it’s surrounded by vast stretches of tropical woodland, dotted with dozens of tiny little rural settlements and laced with networks of highways and dirt roads. Pristine beaches draw a perimeter around Panau, and off the coast you’ll see large clusters of smaller islands speckling the ocean. One such archipelago on the northwest end of the map houses Panau’s capital city, and it’s a richly detailed metropolis that would make most other sandbox environments whimper, yet it’s merely a miniscule portion of what’s available to you here. The official site claims Just Cause 2’s world spans 400 square miles – that’s roughly twenty times the size of Bermuda – and I believe it. Words can’t do justice to what Avalanche have pulled off here; it’s extraordinarily big.

It’s extraordinarily beautiful, too, and rather consistently so, which is alarming given the sheer vastness of Panau. When you’re piloting an airplane or helicopter – which you’ll do quite often, since it’s faster than ground travel – you’ll find yourself drooling over the genuine authenticity of it all: how the landscape morphs seamlessly from rocky terrain to grassy acreage, how the color tones shift in correlation with the angle of the sun. Leave your aircraft to plummet into the side of the mountain while you parachute into any one of Panau’s many lush jungles and you’ll realize they’ve been crafted with more exquisite care than a game this open-ended warrants. The trees, the flora, the bounding contour of the ground… it all feels real. And there is more to Panau than you will ever see, but even what can pessimistically be called dead space needed to be there, to paint the illusion of an environment that is actually feasible, that could realistically exist in our world. As a sandbox game, Just Cause 2 couldn’t be more convincing.

Yet that’s only half the battle. See, the sandbox genre is a tricky one. Give the player too much freedom and the design becomes aimless, with little to no reward. Restrict the player too much with mandatory plot-centric material and you run the risk of negating the existence of an open world to begin with. I could name plenty of well-intentioned sandbox games that fell on one side or the other; the challenge of creating a title like this is in justifying the free-roaming environment without undermining the game within.

Just Cause 2 negates nothing. It knows its audience. It knows that we need to be given something to do, and offers plenty of story missions for us to sink our teeth into: Steal this armored vehicle from this well-fortified base, jump across these rooftops and disarm these bombs, hijack this limousine and kidnap this political figure, and so on and so forth. Where breadth, substance, actual content is concerned, it delivers. But it also knows that the lion’s share of people who play games like this would happily spend just as much of their time slinging themselves across the landscape with a grappling hook whilst making their way from one big, pretty explosion to the next.

With the bulk of the game centering around rebel factions, Avalanche have come up with an excellent compromise: Missions can only be unlocked by wreaking havoc and blowing stuff up. How do you do that? Well, look around. There are literally hundreds of civilian establishments spread out across Panau, and government presence seeps from every single one of them. Jack a helicopter, fly to a location you haven’t yet been to, dive to ground level and you’re bound to find conflict in close range. Steal a boat, make your way to the oil rig just off shore, and plug your ears. Buy some explosives and demolish a gas station. Making tasks like these mandatory opens up Just Cause 2’s world while simultaneously indulging in the sort of entertainment that this sub-genre was built upon in the first place.

I note with just a tinge of regret that the actual combat is relatively standard shooter fare, minus the cover system that’s practically become industry standard by now. We’re at the point where any shooter that doesn’t employ a cover system feels a bit dated, and the run-and-gun bits are the least remarkable aspect of Just Cause 2. I’m also disappointed that the combat makes so little use of the grappling hook, especially after Bionic Commando did such a good job of that. All you can really do here is pull enemies off the sides of buildings and tether objects to one another, and while the latter can lead to some fantastic moments for the inventive player (such as when a military vehicle is in hot pursuit and you attach it to the ground), I would have liked to see our hero’s capabilities in battle explored a bit more.

But, as I say again, never mind. Just Cause 2 is more focused on what you’re doing and less focused on how you go about doing it. There’s a staggering amount of content here – places to go, ways to get there, things to do once you arrive – and anyone who complains that there are a few too many races, or that the “storm and secure this enemy fortress” scenario is repeated one too many times, isn’t looking hard enough for ways to enjoy the game… or perhaps they weren’t the intended audience, anyway. Just Cause 2’s box art features a image of the main character jumping off the roof of a skyscraper just before it explodes – mimicking John McClane, albeit without a fire hose wrapped around his waist – and the game’s “intended audience” will pray that there’s a sequence in which you do precisely that. (Spoiler alert: There is.)

So forget the term “sandbox.” It doesn’t do the game justice. Imagine the developers took every sandbox, playground, jungle gym and McDonald’s PlayPlace across the world and slapped them all together, and came out of the project with one big breeding ground for mayhem and murder the size of an actual country. It delicately and perfectly balances freedom with structure, size with accessibility; in an overstuffed genre, Just Cause 2 hits all the right notes. So perhaps it’s time for the industry to pack up. It’s been fun, and you all get an A for effort, but I’m afraid this contest is over. Just Cause 2 wins the sandbox race. It’s hard to imagine another such title being so rich, so fulfilling, so ridiculously enjoyable.



Suskie's avatar
Featured community review by Suskie (April 24, 2010)

Mike Suskie is a freelance writer who has contributed to GamesRadar and has a blog. He can usually be found on Twitter at @MikeSuskie.

More Reviews by Suskie [+]
Inside (PC) artwork
Inside (PC)

Inside forgoes answering questions that, in Limbo, we were never asking to begin with.
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End (PlayStation 4) artwork
Uncharted 4: A Thief's End (PlayStation 4)

Still generally a blast to play, and aided, as usual, by Naughty Dog's mastery of the latest technological leaps.
Dark Souls III (PC) artwork
Dark Souls III (PC)

Transparently built as a crowd-pleaser, but it feels like an amalgamation of the series' best attributes.

Feedback

If you enjoyed this Just Cause 2 review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
fleinn posted April 25, 2010:

"Making tasks like these mandatory opens up Just Cause 2’s world while simultaneously indulges in the sort of entertainment that this sub-genre was built upon in the first place.

I note with just a tinge of regret that the actual combat is relatively standard shooter fare, minus the cover system that’s practically become industry standard at this point. We’re at the point where any shooter that doesn’t employ a cover system feels a bit dated, and the run-and-gun bits.."

Dude. Perfect segue-way :D (Takes notes)
board icon
radicaldreamer posted April 25, 2010:

"Where breadth, substance, actual content is concerned..."

Should be "are."

"That’s a staggering amount of content here..."

Did you mean "There's"?

Really good review. I thought Just Cause 2 looked really cool and now I'm convinced to pick it up.
board icon
Suskie posted April 25, 2010:

Yeesh, this review really needed some tightening up -- I was tired last night when I subbed it so I didn't even bother to proofread it until now. Laziness never pays off.

Anyway, thanks a lot for the catches and the comments, although I can't tell if Fleinn is being sarcastic or serious.
board icon
fleinn posted April 25, 2010:

No, no, serious. English isn't my first language, so I may not react to sentences that bend grammatical rules, if the sentences still sound right (..that's basically how grammars work in Norwegian :D). And the sentences in this review sound right.

And I thought that break in the review was well done. It happened in the right place, and sneaked in some info about the game's controls without losing the flow, and how much or little the controls really matter.

I didn't mention this either, but you've also managed to clearly split your opinion from your descriptions. It's easy to disagree with how interesting the game is, without thinking your point of view is wrong. Because you describe your view well, and explain exactly why you think as you do. In this case, that helped make a very good review, in my opinion.
board icon
Suskie posted April 25, 2010:

Ah, okay -- I wasn't sure what you meant, since just looking at the excerpt, that bit looked hastily inserted to me. But then again I've never been a particularly good judge of my own work.

Anyway, thanks a lot! And that's cool that you're Norwegian. I didn't realize that English was your second language.
board icon
fleinn posted April 26, 2010:

Really? lol. No, now that I read it again, you could probably turn the sentence around a bit, so the meaning would be more clear and straight forward. But the rhythm is just right.

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

User Help | Contact | Ethics | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998 - 2024 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Just Cause 2 is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Just Cause 2, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.