Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Discord button  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | PC | PS4 | PS5 | SWITCH | VITA | XB1 | XSX | All

Mr. Nutz (SNES) artwork

Mr. Nutz (SNES) review

"It's clear that the adventure — which begins in "Woody Land" — was heavily influenced by Sonic the Hedgehog, as Mr. Nutz collects coins from nooks and crannies across numerous expansive levels. Unlike Sonic, there's no time limit; the squirrel with attitude can ride slow-floating sponges across acidic waters, swing around on vines, and clumsily bounce off of pinball blocks at his own leisurely pace without fear of Time Over. He definitely does dawdle; even holding the "run" button barely picks up the pace."

In 2009, the HonestGamers site invited readers to "torture Zigfried". Readers selected from a list of ten commonly-berated titles, with the promise of a review detailing the painful experience. For the first episode of "torture Zigfried", Mr. Nutz was the game chosen by the majority of the userbase. We sincerely hope you enjoy the review more than Zigfried enjoyed the game.


A few years back, while flipping through a newstand magazine, I came across a short review for Kabuki Warriors. The writer claimed to have beaten the game by rubbing the controller against his ass. I've played Kabuki Warriors. It's a bad game. An easy one, too. But it's not so easy that it can seriously be conquered via ass-rubbing. The thing is, that game makes an easy target. It wasn't highly anticipated, the developers weren't a media darling, and it had little to no hype. Those are the kinds of games upon which reviewers vent all their pent-up frustrations, since professionalism compels them to restrain their resentment and anger when disappointed by "big" (i.e. "real") games.

That may sound unfair. Writers are more likely to cut loose when reviewing unknown games from smaller studios . . . but shouldn't all games be treated with the same level of professionalism and respect? In theory, it's easy to say such double standards are misguided. In practice, those ultra-bash reviews are the ones that give writers a reputation for being witty and cool. The phenomenon isn't limited to pro reviews; amateurs love to tear 16-bit games like Shaq Fu and Barney's Hide and Seek apart. I think most of us have gone through that phase at some point.

It's now 2009, and I'm reviewing Mr. Nutz for the Super Nintendo. I'd be hard pressed to find a game that is LESS relevant to the world at large. The only reason I'm doing this is because the site's fine userbase thought the game would be atrocious. They want me to rip it to shreds with biting venom. The screens for Mr. Nutz don't look particularly appalling . . . but it does look like a childrens' game. Targets don't come much easier than an old, forgotten kids' game.

Sorry, readers; you're about to be disappointed. I need not prove my manliness by smashing innocent games to a bloody pulp! Mr. Nutz is a mediocre game, but it is not a bad game.

It's clear that the adventure -- which begins in "Woody Land" -- was heavily influenced by Sonic the Hedgehog, as Mr. Nutz collects coins from nooks and crannies across numerous expansive levels. Unlike Sonic, there's no time limit; the squirrel with attitude can ride slow-floating sponges across acidic waters, swing around on vines, and clumsily bounce off of pinball blocks at his own leisurely pace without fear of Time Over. He definitely does dawdle; even holding the "run" button barely picks up the pace. Mr. Nutz clearly realizes there's no clock.

There's no battery backup, either, so be prepared to give up an entire afternoon or dateless evening to consecutively finish 24 long stages. Later ports wisely added a password feature. The SNES version does include a world map reminiscent of Ghouls 'n Ghosts that zooms in and out for no particular reason, but I wouldn't call that an even trade.

Although bright and colorful, the scenery is mundane, which compounds the dull pacing. The most exciting locale is a haunted kitchen populated by walking lightbulbs, walking roasted turkeys, and flying bees, all of which are defeated in the same three ways: jump on top of them, pelt them with nuts, or slash them with Mr. Nutz' mighty tail (which is the one thing in the game that is RIDICULOUSLY well-animated). Regardless of appearance, enemies rarely do more than walk or fly back and forth from left to right in set patterns . . . even after they "see" the heroic squirrel, their patterns remain unchanged and undaunted. The slow, saccharine music makes this all feel even less exciting.

For all of these faults, Mr. Nutz is absolutely playable. The controls are responsive enough and the challenges fair enough to spare this game from the vicious beating that site readers expected. Cruel writers would smash this game over their mighty knees. Kinder souls would say the colorful and playable quest meets its goal of mindlessly entertaining children. After all, children have low expectations.

I reject that school of thought! It's true that subtlety and narrative complexity are often lost on a child's mind but, if anything, childrens' games should show more wild imagination and more blatant emotion.

The Sega CD's Popful Mail opens with a hilarious sequence depicting an elven bounty hunter chasing the villainous "Nuts Cracker". Nuts looks like a walking, talking nutcracker, and titular Mail is after his head. While running through that game's version of Woody Land, the cackling Nuts Cracker actually removes his own head and lobs it at Mail. The head unleashes a puff of smoke, and Nuts Cracker escapes. The dejected Mail returns to town and tries to cash in the head . . . unfortunately, she discovers that the guildmaster already has a stack of fake Nuts heads. It's broad humor -- the type that children can appreciate -- but more importantly, it's an imaginative scene that engages the mind.

Children are immensely impressionable; making games for children means developers aren't bound by conventional rules and logic. Mr. Nutz is a thoroughly conventional game that uses "for children" to excuse the designers' stifling laziness and lack of imagination, instead of using "for children" to open doors for creative minds that want to escape.

Children are the people who'll be designing our entertainment in twenty years. Would you rather play games crafted by people who grew up with Super Mario Bros. 3 and strive for artistic excellence, or would you rather play games churned out by people who grew up with Mr. Nutz and see game development as nothing more than a way to earn money? As reviewers, we should be professional . . . but as gamers, it's our duty to demand excellence instead of giving "kids' games" an insulting free pass. Otherwise, in twenty years, there might be a whole lot more crappy games for reviewers to supposedly beat by rubbing controllers against their asses.


zigfried's avatar
Staff review by Zigfried (June 24, 2009)

Zigfried likes writing about whales and angry seamen, and often does so at the local pub.

More Reviews by Zigfried [+]
Attack on Titan (PlayStation 4) artwork
Attack on Titan (PlayStation 4)

Koei's latest not-a-Musou lives up to the source material.
Deception IV: The Nightmare Princess (PlayStation 4) artwork
Deception IV: The Nightmare Princess (PlayStation 4)

Tecmo Koei continues to stake their claim on PS4 with quality software.
One Chance (PC) artwork
One Chance (PC)

One Chance is a bad game for obvious reasons. The graphics are poor, the music is repetitive, the guy walks slowly, the story is silly, player interaction is minimal, and victory is achieved through repetition instead of mastery. Its claim to fame is that you only have one chance unless you game the syst...


If you enjoyed this Mr. Nutz review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
zippdementia posted June 27, 2009:

Mediocre games make for rough reviews. This one definitely isn't one of your more interesting, but I'm not sure I can blame YOU for that. Like you said, it would be a cop-out to just bash the game, but what do you then say about a fifteen year old SNES game for kids? I KNEW you should've gone for Xenogears. Promise me that will make it back on the list at some point.

This paragraph bugs me:
The Sega CD's Popful Mail opens with a hilarious sequence depicting an elven bounty hunter chasing the villainous "Nuts Cracker"....

I think you're talking about an entirely new game. It's a strange... well, no it's a LACKING transition. As in, there is no transition. It took me quite a few reads to get your thought trail down. Now, I AM pretty tired, so maybe I'll read it in the morning and wonder how I couldn't follow that, but I do think there is some confusion here.

You know, it probably has less to do with transition and more to do with the similar names. When you went off about "nut cracker" as opposed to "Nutz" I started mixing up the games. When you mention Woody Land, I got even more confuzzled. So maybe a more distinct example would be called for?

board icon
jerec posted June 27, 2009:

I also commented on that paragraph. Stay tuned.
board icon
zigfried posted June 28, 2009:

Now that the verdict's in, I'll explain:

The Popful Mail paragraph is an example that directly correlates to the two-sentence paragraph above it. For my argument about game design to work, it requires a positive example: something to show that there really are games that do things right. Playing Mr Nutz made me think of that scene from Popful Mail, which is why I chose that particular game as the positive example. I could attach the words "For example," to the front of the paragraph, but including those words sounds a little too pandering and hammer-on-the-headish. So in this case, point taken, but I'll have to leave it as is.

I referred to it as "The Sega CD's Popful Mail" so that the inclusion of the system name would clearly distinguish it as being a different game (since I'm assuming not everyone has heard of Popful Mail). I understand the point about the example seeming to come out of nowhere -- especially if people don't connect it to the preceding paragraph -- but getting the two games mixed up... uh, I don't really know what to say about that.

board icon
darketernal posted June 29, 2009:

When I first saw it, I couldn't help but wonder if this was a new hentai review by Zig. The name was certainly suggestive and it would have to be completely and utterly awesome. This disappointed me.
board icon
drella posted June 29, 2009:

I'm not disappointed with the individual review so much as I'm admirable of an author willing to extend beyond his usual coverage and try and do something different rather than bash an easy target. He also reviewed a game everyone asked him to review! Cool!

That said, although Zig highlights some examples (Woody Land), I think more time might have been merited to the new wave of kid's games with, um, less than subtle adult jokes. The trend seems condescending towards children, the intended audience, and fits in nicely with the theme of kids deserving more from this package. They deserve more imagination, as Zig demonstrates, but they shouldn't come back in five years and realize the joke was on them either. Movies like the Shrek series appeal to adults and children with wit; there's not a lot of wit in dubbing a place "Woody Land."
board icon
EmP posted June 29, 2009:

I'll make a solitary stand: I though the review was outstanding even if my paraniod mind did initially think it was a dig at the kiddy DS games I've been covering for a while. It was a thought provoking piece that transended the goofy tale of an angry squirrel and made me think about how I look at videogames as a whole. As such, I thought it was perhaps the best review I've read all year.

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

User Help | Contact | Ethics | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2021 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Mr. Nutz is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Mr. Nutz, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.