User: Felix_Arabia Title: Posted: July 24, 2008 (06:36 AM)
The opening line is memorable, though not necessarily in a good way.
User: drella Title: Posted: July 24, 2008 (07:03 PM)
I think it's kind of funny Divine Sealing is over covered, while Genesis shooters just as bad (Truxton, Insector-X) aren't, because everyone wants to review a game with naked ladies.
Because really, that's the -only- reason I can think of as to why it's over covered.
User: drella Title: Posted: July 24, 2008 (07:06 PM)
Actually at 3 and 2 reviews apiece on the site, Insector and Truxton are more covered than I remember (didn't remember OD reviewing either). But the point still stands.
User: Genj Title: Posted: July 24, 2008 (07:40 PM)
I really enjoyed reading about your erect penis. Thanks.
User: overdrive Title: Posted: July 24, 2008 (08:01 PM)
Those are older reviews of mine done when I was churning out shmup reviews like clockwork. Easy to imagine them getting lost in the shuffle, as I have trouble remembering anything much about them.
But yeah, I only reviewed Divine Sealing because of the naked chicks. Or at least that was the main reason. Games like that are lightning rods because it's so easy to rip on them. It was a horrible shooter on its own merits. But it added hentai scenes of women who didn't really seem happy about being shown with fewer and fewer clothes. Good S&M game because you have to have sadistic tendencies to get into their looks of anguish, but you have to have masochistic tendencies to play the stupid thing.
And now, I'll toss a 2/10 out there and I guess I've reviewed this one (short review here) a second time!
User: pickhut Title: Posted: July 24, 2008 (08:18 PM)
Nonsense! I only reviewed Divine Sealing because it gave me a valid excuse to talk about my dick.
User: bluberry Title: Posted: July 24, 2008 (09:00 PM)
good S&M game my ass, there's not a single strapon, flogger, or piss funnel to be seen in those screenshots.
Opinions expressed in this blog represent the opinions of those expressing them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of site staff, users and/or sponsors. Unless otherwise stated, content above belongs to its copyright holders and may not be reproduced without express written permission.