User: honestgamer Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (12:45 AM)
I guess we are coming up on the time that it usually starts, aren't we? I know that I was looking forward to see it happen, though I'm not sure of the capacity in which I could/would participate. Probably in the draft pool again would be best for me.
User: jerec Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (03:55 AM)
Are there enough active reviewers to make it work, though?
User: JANUS2 Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (08:16 AM)
Maybe we should have a TT Topic to guage interest?
User: Suskie Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (09:10 AM)
There usually is one by now, as far as I know. This is why I'm asking.
User: zippdementia Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (11:38 AM)
Who usually heads this thing up? EmP?
I'd like to see TT again. We may have to change the numbers around if we can't get the reviewers together... you know, pairs instead of four person teams. The Wingman and the Gunner scenario. Which would be really fun, actually.
User: JANUS2 Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (12:10 PM)
Or just have three man teams but more matches - e.g. Home and away ( you could stipulate that only one matchup can be kept the same to encourage varied matchups)
User: wolfqueen001 Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (12:14 PM)
Felix was supposed to have put something up regarding this after the Wacky tourney thingy, but my guess is that he got busy with work or something, which is perfectly reasonable, so who knows what'll happen.
User: Suskie Title: Posted: June 03, 2010 (01:27 PM)
I'm pretty sure the solution in the past has been to decrease the number of teams to six, with a five-week regular season and no semifinals. Obviously that's not ideal, but I'm fine with anything as long as we're not doing that stupid bracket bullshit again.
Felix sent me a preparatory HG mail a while back asking if I'm still interested in judging this year and I haven't heard anything since. He and EmP usually take charge so maybe they'll know what's up.
Opinions expressed in this blog represent the opinions of those expressing them and do not necessarily reflect the opinions of site staff, users and/or sponsors. Unless otherwise stated, content above belongs to its copyright holders and may not be reproduced without express written permission.