Google+   Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | DS | PS3 | PS4 | PSP | VITA | WII | WIIU | X360 | XB1 | All

foe_en_s4_b22.jpg

SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs Confrontation (PlayStation 3) artwork

SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs Confrontation (PlayStation 3) review


"SOCOM: Confrontation changes that dynamic and suffers for it. The way things work now, a single player from the opposing team might choose a light machine gun, run into a squad of tactical players and very likely win the day. Gone are the days of carefully planned movements and teamwork, replaced by generic run-and-gun gameplay commonly found in less creative or realistic games such as Halo and Half-Life. Certainly the game can be every ounce the tactical shooter experience you might expect if both teams choose to play tactically, but this rarely happens in random public matches."



If you've played any previous entries in the popular SOCOM series over the years, you've probably appreciated how they let you feel like part of a team of elite soldiers. You've perhaps enjoyed the way that your abilities--and those of your team members--were put to the test in both single-player missions and online skirmishes. The franchise has always excelled at the latter in particular, successfully merging action with tactical gameplay and team dynamics thanks to its pioneering use of a headset (new to console gaming at the time). That setup to a certain extent became the defining element for the whole range of games, so perhaps it shouldn't come as a surprise that with SOCOM: Confrontation serving as the leap from the PlayStation 2 to the PlayStation 3, the less popular single-player campaign was axed.

Of course, this move isn't necessarily a good idea. Those who have taken the past installments online know that there are two general types of player: those who play tactically... and those who don’t. Entire games can be filled with one or the other of the two types. Until now, tactical combat would typically win over run-and-gun gaming.

SOCOM: Confrontation changes that dynamic and suffers for it. The way things work now, a single player from the opposing team might choose a light machine gun, run into a squad of tactical players and very likely win the day. Gone are the days of carefully planned movements and teamwork, replaced by generic run-and-gun gameplay commonly found in less creative or realistic games such as Halo and Half-Life. Certainly the game can be every ounce the tactical shooter experience you might expect if both teams choose to play tactically, but this rarely happens in random public matches. Instead, you'll have to join or create a team for use against other teams.

Run-and-gun gameplay carries through in other ways, too. Most matches involve certain objects located on the map, such as a “control point” or VIPs that must be extricated from the area by helicopter. Although many players complete these objectives as they play, they seem to do so almost by accident as they focus on simply killing the other team entirely (which is much less time consuming and more easily accomplished). What this means for Confrontation is that every match is essentially a deathmatch.

Before you head online to witness such things for yourself, your Confrontation experience will begin with character customization. Each player has two types: a Navy SEAL and a mercenary. Both can be tweaked as desired with different armor and clothing types, guns and accessories (grenade launchers, laser scopes, sights and silencers). While the game can't really be blamed, it's odd that each side can only equip certain weapons. For truly balanced play--and realism--all types should have been available to both classes. There's no good reason that a SEAL shouldn't be able to carry an SG552, nor a mercenary a G36C.

A similar restriction applies when it comes time to outfit your soldier. While perhaps it's true that most mercenaries wouldn't have the same access to high-tech fatigues as the SEALs, their options here seem downright insufficient. Meanwhile, the SEALs have many, many options. Not that it matters all that much; many of the patterns might look distinct and effective in the armory menus where players choose their gear, but head in-game and you'll notice everything take a steep dive. Nearly everything looks like colored mud, even on an HDTV.

At least the environments themselves provide suitable eye candy. You'll see a lot of bombed out urban environments--and concrete--but there's ambiance aplenty amid the destruction. Small graphical details such as varying wall textures and different types of rocks and mud really add to the visual experience. The PS3 allows for great draw distance too, something that enables terrific sniper gameplay.

Speaking of sniping, it's worth mentioning that the developers have produced a satisfying laser sight. It's much more realistic than the artificial laser sights in games like Cold Fear and Resident Evil 4. Dots grow larger or smaller depending on distance from the associated gun. When you're not properly covered, it's especially worrying to see a red dot stray over your character's head. Such things may not factor into most matches all that substantially, but the sight in Confrontation does add something special to the experience.

Unfortunately, the same can't be said of the forgettable soundtrack. Available selections range from ignorable to downright annoying, with the result more often sounding like a salsa dance-off than it does a battle between the forces of good and evil. As far as sound effects go, there's not much here that represents a change from what we heard in previous SOCOM titles, right down to gunfire that mostly sounds the same regardless of the weapon in use. With that said, Confrontation does do an excellent job of altering the pitch according to the distance from which a shot was fired. You'll be able to appreciate that even if you don't have a surround sound system. Not many games manage to pull this off, so it's good that Confrontation--where sound must be relied upon to locate enemies--manages it so well.

The same proficiency wasn't applied to the controls, however. Even though it represents a vast improvement over the options available in previous SOCOM titles, the setup in Confrontation still manages to feel stale and outdated. A lot of that comes down to the 'quick switch' feature, which allows you to change press the 'L1' shoulder button for a handy explosive. The problem is that it's far too easy to accidentally toss a smoke grenade when what you really need is a rifle. Another issue is the inventory wheel, accessed by holding the 'O' button. This brings up a ring of the weapons currently available, with the left analog stick allowing the player to choose one. It sounds good on paper, but it's not. Too much force is required to get your selection to even register, so that you basically have to stop whatever you're doing just to switch weapons. That's a definite problem with a game as fast-paced as this one.

What all of the above means in the end is that while SOCOM: Confrontation isn't a bad game, it also isn't particularly good. The game ships with seven maps--with more downloadable ones scheduled to arrive later--and a Bluetooth headset that isn't particularly useful when the game so actively encourages run-and-gun heroics instead of the tactical action fans likely expect. Sure, it's a nice peripheral in and of itself, but its impact on the game is minimal. As such, newcomers probably won't find much to like about the game and it will quickly become the domain of those few hardcore players who are willing to devote hours on end to dominating all challengers. Unless that sounds like you, this is one mission you probably won't enjoy.

Rating: 7/10

Probester's avatar
Freelance review by Sam Cheung (November 16, 2008)

A bio for this contributor is currently unavailable, but check back soon to see if that changes. If you are the author of this review, you can update your bio from the Settings page.

More Reviews by Sam Cheung
Call of Duty: World at War (PlayStation 3) artwork
Call of Duty: World at War (PlayStation 3)

Call of Duty: World At War is a good example of money cow milking at work. Following the success of Call of Duty 4, the people behind Call of Duty must have thought “Let’s go back to World War II, except we’ll just port over this new system that people like!”, then proceed to churn out copies of World at War. The resul...
The Saboteur (PlayStation 3) artwork
The Saboteur (PlayStation 3)

The Saboteur is an excellent game. That said, it seemed like someone might have snuck into the game studio before mass production and sabotaged the project before it was released. The otherwise excellent ideas and aesthetic styles clash with an overly simplistic gameplay system and a plethora of glitches.
Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles (Wii) artwork
Resident Evil: The Darkside Chronicles (Wii)

When Resident Evil: Umbrella Chronicles came out, there were several glaring omissions from the level selection. What happened to Resident Evil 2? Or Code Veronica? It was pretty obvious that Capcom left them out on purpose. Perhaps they thought RE2 and RE3 were too similar in location to both feature on the same game?...

Feedback

If you enjoyed this SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs Confrontation review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
Lewis posted November 17, 2008:

Only skim-read this, but seems like an exceptionally high score for a game that's "not particularly good" and people "probably won't like."
board icon
Probester posted November 18, 2008:

I wanted a 6.5, but we don't do half scores. Really though, a lot of people who haven't played old SOCOM games might not find some of the things half bad. And I admit I'm quite picky when it comes to games that claim they're one thing, but is really just catering to mainstream gaming on the other hand. Again, a lot of people don't mind this. I felt I personally was too hard on it, since I mentioned a lot of nit picky things, so I decided to go to 7 instead of 6.
board icon
Lewis posted November 18, 2008:

Fair do's. I should probably read the whole thing really.
board icon
drella posted November 18, 2008:

I think the biggest question here is whether you enjoyed the game. Because my impression from this is no, you didn't, but you're assuming other people might and factoring that into your scoring and analysis. This muddles things a lot more than you'd think.

In some cases it makes sense to predict who might like a game, but I think more often than not it backs the writer into a corner where they end up wavering. There's some really good information on the game here. You've just got to tie it together firmly with a few lines in the end where you're honest with what you, and you alone, thought of the overall package. If it rubs some the wrong way then so be it, because there's sufficient information here to justify it for sure.

In short: don't be meek.

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

Info | Help | Privacy Policy | Contact | Advertise | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2014 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs Confrontation is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to SOCOM: U.S. Navy SEALs Confrontation, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors.