Patreon button  Steam curated reviews  Discord button  Facebook button  Twitter button 
3DS | PC | PS4 | PS5 | SWITCH | VITA | XB1 | XSX | All

Thief: Deadly Shadows (PC) artwork

Thief: Deadly Shadows (PC) review

"Does a game lose worth for providing too much of a challenge? Forcing the player into a routine of patience in order to beat its difficulty is the very crux of the Thief franchise, so it seems a little unfair to berate an admittedly well-crafted videogame for this reason."

Allow me to focus your attention on one particular segment of Thief: Deadly Shadows. It takes place towards the end of this mercilessly tough game, so only those with the patience of gods will find themselves staring up at the foreboding silhouette of Shalebridge Cradle. It is, without a doubt, one of the crowning moments of level design to this day, built on a foundation of abject terror and a perfected storytelling technique. It's difficult to explain the wonderfulness of this level without ruining its magic entirely, but as a format breaker it's fantastic for all the wrong reasons - and I mean 'wrong' in the absolute finest sense of the word. Barely anything occurs, except for the slow-burning discovery of What Happened Before. It's counter-intuitive, counter-productive and remorselessly confusing. But as the individual aspects start to come together to form a fabulously cohesive and deeply unsettling whole... well. That's Thief at its best.

It's Thief into the new generation of 'games as a narrative device', and this section comes closer than anything yet to realising the videogame's true potential: to tell stories in a way that no other medium could ever hope to achieve. The Cradle's finest aspect is its divine subtlety, its total refusal to force itself upon the player in any way other than as a character in its own right. In this derelict asylum lay a hundred dark secrets, each relegated to the darkest of corners, out of the obvious line of sight. Play through the mission with no care for this, and you'll still find yourself treated to a delectable sub-plot regarding the building's history. But delve a little deeper, and be rewarded with some of the finest storytelling in the modern videogame.

Thief at its best. The rest isn't quite so remarkable.

Thief's primary stumbling block for many will be its terribly slow pace. This is obviously an intentional focus, but it completely lacks an adequate sense of reward for the patience it demands. More than anything, it's incredibly difficult - perhaps no more so than the previous Thief offerings, but where it suffers in comparison to Looking Glass-era Thief is in creating an experience that often becomes more frustrating than tense. The improved AI - while still not functioning quite how it should - makes the familiar challenges completely overwhelming to begin with, and it takes real persistence to get to the stage where the game's sneaky style becomes gripping rather than tediously punishing. Regardless of genre, a videogame should be fun from the outset. Deadly Shadows' difficulty curve is bizarrely inverted, and the entertainment factor suffers as a result. It took me nine or ten attempts to complete the training mission, yet I wandered through the aforementioned Cradle - only a couple of hours from the end - in one go. Perplexing and disappointing.

Of course, this might be a symptom of my simply being crap at stealth games, but I'm inclined to think otherwise as I never had a problem with the series' previous incarnations. In a game very obviously designed with newcomers in mind - it's the first Thief to be developed for two machines, and it's marketed to a much wider audience than ever before - it seems cruel to be quite so punishing towards those with no previous experience of the franchise.

Even for particularly adept players, progress through this world is so sluggish that any sense of reward is replaced half with relief and half with exasperation. Certain missions can take hours to complete, and Thief has an irritating tendency to add reams of additional objectives once the central one has been reached. It feels like the game is a really bad sport. It never wants you to win.

In the new trend of non-linear gaming, Deadly Shadows makes a brave leap into the light and centres its already open-plan missions around a city hub, which the player is free to explore at will between tasks. This concept had me gleefully excited in the pre-release whispers, so I was disappointed to discover that it hasn't been implemented to any useful degree. The 'city' is painfully small, but even if you do chance upon a new area, it's still going to be yet another arduous task to explore it. Garret may be the master of deception, but the entire local population seems to instantly recognise him. Being detected by the guards lands you in jail; being detected by civilians results in everyone running to the guards who put you in jail; trying to escape from jail renders you a little helpless as you lie on the floor in a pool of your own blood, having been detected by more guards. You can see where the mob at Ion Storm was going with this: as a full-time thief, your job is perpetually risky. But once again, they've missed the mark. Once again, they forgot to make it fun.

As is the norm in the Thief games, attempting any sort of sword-based combat is hugely inadvisable, due to the fact that swords tend to cut you in half and stuff. Here, the difficulty level is increased by melee combat being absolutely rubbish. You'd think a master thief would be able to handle a simple weapon correctly, but instead he swings it with about as much power as your average four-month-old baby. Acting as a crushingly fitting metaphor for the majority of the game, hand-to-hand fighting is a sluggish and tedious process, destroying any tension with its complete ignorance of the player's actual ability. As mentioned previously, AI is improved: enemies running away to regroup, then returning en masse to track you down, is a particularly nice touch. But it still does things like - to pick one example - makes knocking a guard unconscious three metres away from another foe an entirely silent occurrence in-game.

Oh, I don't know. It's just as if Ion Storm had a thousand bright ideas, then incorporated them without a second thought about their contribution to Thief's entertainment value.

Which ties in nicely with a debate I've enjoyed having lately: to what extent should games be measured solely on 'fun-factor' versus their contribution to modern culture? A friend suggested that the true greats - the Deus Exes, the Half-Lives, the BioShocks and the Bloodlineses - have something more to say than merely "look at me, Iím adorably enjoyable," and as such fit into an entire subcategory of entertainment in their own right. In other words, they're not 'just' games. Despite the regularity of my sycophantic 'games as art' ramblings, I'm not sure I buy into this theory, particularly after my time spent with Deadly Shadows.

The breezy confidence of its narrative drive is enormously admirable, teeming as it is with memorable characters, deep histories and innovative deliveries. No one who plays more than an hour of the game will ever question that Deadly Shadows is clever. But when it's at the expense of the very point of the medium - or at least, what it's most commonly considered to be - then the game is always going to fall short. Because, ultimately, it is still a game.

At its best, it absolutely succeeds in being enthralling, moving and thrilling - but often in spite of its core mechanics. It's worth noting that the game's most memorable and exhilarating passage, Shalebridge Cradle, is one of the few segments where the difficulty drops, and the player is allowed to become immersed in the universe without the constant need to quickload back out of it.

Which brings me to this concluding pondering: does a game lose worth for providing too much of a challenge? Forcing the player into a routine of patience in order to beat its difficulty is the very crux of the Thief franchise, so it seems a little unfair to berate an admittedly well-crafted videogame for this reason. And I've gone off on one a little bit, which is terrible of me, because there are no shades at all of a bad game here. The maze-like levels are designed particularly well, crafted under a masterful marriage of technology and creativity, brought to life by beautiful architecture and disconcerting bumps in the night. And at its best, Thief manages to absorb and captivate with its constant intensity: sitting in the shadows, wielding your blackjack, preparing to pounce at the right moment; aiming a water arrow in a perfect arc over a courtyard to extinguish a light source; stealing treasures from a man's room while he sleeps inches away; running through Shalebridge Cradle, trying desperately to escape its horrors as the doors of the building bolt themselves shut...

Thief at its best - which makes the rest stand out a little too much.

Lewis's avatar
Freelance review by Lewis Denby (October 05, 2008)

A bio for this contributor is currently unavailable, but check back soon to see if that changes. If you are the author of this review, you can update your bio from the Settings page.

More Reviews by Lewis Denby [+]
Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City (PlayStation 3) artwork
Resident Evil: Operation Raccoon City (PlayStation 3)

A dismally unimaginative co-op shooter, coupled with a half-finished idea for an intriguing competitive component. Play it in either mode and youíll be bored or irritated within minutes.
To the Moon (PC) artwork
To the Moon (PC)

Its retro graphics look beautiful. The original soundtrack is utterly stunning. Its story is one of the most confident and grown-up that our medium has ever seen. Donít approach To the Moon expecting taxing puzzles or combat or stats, because that isnít what itís about. It is its own thing: an indie adventure a...
Unreal (PC) artwork
Unreal (PC)

As a first-person shooter, itís incredibly competent. Quake 2 might have had the tempo, and Half-Life the suspenseful pacing, but Unreal had the variety and the challenge. Its weapons drew criticism for feeling weak and weedy against the Skaarj oppressors, and itís a fair comment. They often do. Bu...


If you enjoyed this Thief: Deadly Shadows review, you're encouraged to discuss it with the author and with other members of the site's community. If you don't already have an HonestGamers account, you can sign up for one in a snap. Thank you for reading!

board icon
bloomer posted October 07, 2008:

I thought this review was 90% great. The 10% was the first paragraph, which seems to be hyperbolic and nebulous, and also further endangers everything with the 'words cannot describe this thing I'm not really explaining' approach. But the rest rocked :)
board icon
Lewis posted October 08, 2008:

Cheers for the comments.

The Cradle is the sort of thing that turns me into the hyperbolic freak I become occasionally. See also Bloodlines, and the narrative design of BioShock. It's really, really good, and I thought it seemed a fairer starting point than the bad bits would have made for.

As for its being nebulous... well, that was sort of intentional. I'd be similarly vague when reviewing the Big Twist in something like The Sixth Sense, for example - but its equally worth a mention.

Absolutely appreciate the feedback, though. As I've always said, I'm constantly looking to fine-tune my writing abilities. So yeah: bonzer!

EDIT: Why the bloody have I become Suskie? <-
board icon
wolfqueen001 posted October 16, 2008:

Hey, Lewis; I found this:

Nothing like the attention EmP's review got, but it's still something at least!

I personally find that only staff reviews get linked from other sites it seems. Kind of disappointing, really.

As a side note, what is wrong with taht site? Games from 4 years ago are not retro. NES, Genesis, and all those systems are retro.
board icon
overdrive posted October 16, 2008:

WQ: I noticed my Dragon Quest V review was getting obscene hits compared to my usual retro review. Googled it and found it was linked at that site too. In less than a week, I'm over 400 hits, which blows my mind, as I wouldn't expect more than 150-200 for that time period.
board icon
honestgamer posted October 16, 2008:

I personally find that only staff reviews get linked from other sites it seems. Kind of disappointing, really.

I hope that didn't come as a surprise to you. I realize that our user reviews are better than those you can find anywhere else that comes to mind, but they also aren't the 'official' word of the site and therefore the main motivation to link to them is effectively removed entirely.

Sites aren't going to link to GameFAQs user reviews, or customer reviews, for obvious reasons. The fact that our user reviews are written at a much higher level than that doesn't really enter the equation when it comes to off-site linking.
board icon
wolfqueen001 posted October 17, 2008:

No, not surprising, just disappointing.

Well, I think magic juggler's review got linked on some site somewhere, but I don't think it was anything official.

Though all this does make me wonder where large user hits come from in the first place. Or at least the rapidly acquired ones. I know I have a few reviews that have scored crazy hits in just a month, and I'm sure other users have, too. Sometimes it seems like just from around here isn't enough, but maybe it is. But trying to find it linked elsewere is almost pointless.
board icon
overdrive posted October 17, 2008:

Perhaps from RotW winning. I know from my pre-staff days, all of my RotW-winning reviews got way more hits than any of my other ones due to being featured and on the front page for longer than the norm.
board icon
wolfqueen001 posted October 17, 2008:

This much is true for me as well, but the two reviews with the most hits for me (Age of Empires and Digimon) never won RotW. One placed second, but the topic's dead now.

And actually, one of my RotW reviews doesn't even have that many hits for an RotW win, so these things aren't concrete.

It's interesting how these things turn out sometimes.
board icon
honestgamer posted October 17, 2008:

Most of the hits that user reviews receive come from Google. It's simply a matter of writing about the things that the typical Internet user is looking to read about (but that the 'major' sites haven't covered well). Something about Naruto or Digimon or any number of other licenses for young, teen boys will generally do pretty well. Some popular PC titles do surprisingly well, also. Unless you're one of the first to write about the hottest new console release--which most of you almost never are--you'll probably get fairly poor traffic compared to those who write about great retro stuff that people played when they were younger and are looking to read about now. Plus, covering that stuff can give you a real boost if said game releases on the Virtual Console or a variation comes out on another platform.

That same thing affects staff, by the way, only the amount of traffic we can receive is exaggerated by links from GameRankings and other such sites. Sometimes, for whatever reason, a staff writer and a general user will review the same game around the same time and it's the general user that builds up hits more quickly. The Internet is unpredictable like that.
board icon
disco1960 posted October 17, 2008:

Huh, I was wondering why my most popular review was for an old Yu-gi-oh! game.

You must be signed into an HonestGamers user account to leave feedback on this review.

User Help | Contact | Ethics | Sponsor Guide | Links

eXTReMe Tracker
© 1998-2021 HonestGamers
None of the material contained within this site may be reproduced in any conceivable fashion without permission from the author(s) of said material. This site is not sponsored or endorsed by Nintendo, Sega, Sony, Microsoft, or any other such party. Thief: Deadly Shadows is a registered trademark of its copyright holder. This site makes no claim to Thief: Deadly Shadows, its characters, screenshots, artwork, music, or any intellectual property contained within. Opinions expressed on this site do not necessarily represent the opinion of site staff or sponsors. Staff and freelance reviews are typically written based on time spent with a retail review copy or review key for the game that is provided by its publisher.