Pac-Man |
|
|
|
|
Publisher Region Released |
|
Staff
|
Pac-Man review (Atari 2600) |
|||
Reviewed by Rob Hamilton (June 21, 2012) However, just because I had fun times with family while playing this game doesn't mean I can excuse its large list of faults. That period of time can best be described as good times with a bad game simply because we didn't know any better. |
||||
|
||||
Reader
|
Pac-Man review (Atari 2600) |
|||
Reviewed by JoeTheDestroyer (April 23, 2011) Near-death experiences result in a dead Packy lying in a pool of ectoplasm. Tempting fate, moving recklessly and taking chances were what Pac-Man was all about. Take that away and you rob the game its soul. |
||||
|
||||
Reader
|
Pac-Man review (Atari 2600) |
|||
Reviewed by m0zart (April 11, 2006) I remember Christmas 1981 so well. It was a season of anticipation for one of the few gifts I wanted that year -- a copy of the Atari 2600 port of "Pac-Man". That game had literally dominated the arcades since it arrived, and I was weary of having to stand in line for a chance to play a game that might only last five minutes. Games of speed and skill like "Pac-Man" took time to master, and it seemed like the ration of time I received in respect to other gamers just wasn't enough to develop the n... |
||||
|
||||
Reader
|
Pac-Man review (Atari 2600) |
|||
Reviewed by retro (October 31, 2003) That was the question that most people had to ask after they saw and played this Atari 2600 rendition of the arcade classic for the first time. |
||||
|
||||
Do you have something to say about Pac-Man but you'd rather not spend the time writing an actual review? You can talk about the game right here with other users and you don't even need an HonestGamers account to do it!
comments powered by Disqus
Info | Help | Privacy Policy | Contact | Advertise | Links